Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37085932›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental microbiome2023

Metapangenomics of wild and cultivated banana microbiome reveals a plethora of host-associated protective functions.

Simrandeep Singh, Shiva A Aghdam, Rachel M Lahowetz, Amanda M V Brown

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental microbiome, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
6.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. How genomics can help unravel the evolution of endophytic fungi.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. The Endophytic Microbiome of Wild GrapevinesPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Simrandeep SinghDepartment of Microbiology, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL, USA.
Shiva A AghdamDepartment of Biological Sciences, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX, USA.
Rachel M LahowetzDepartment of Molecular Virology and Microbiology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
Amanda M V BrownDepartment of Biological Sciences, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX, USA. amanda.mv.brown@ttu.edu.
Texas Tech University · USBaylor College of Medicine · USUniversity of Illinois Urbana-Champaign · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMicrobiomes are critical to plants, promoting growth, elevating stress tolerance, and expanding the plant's metabolic repertoire with novel defense pathways. However, generally microbiomes within plant tissues, which intimately interact with their hosts, remain poorly characterized. These endospheres have become a focus in banana (Musa spp.)-an important plant for study of microbiome-based disease protection. Banana is important to global food security, while also being critically threatened by pandemic diseases. Domestication and clonal propagation are thought to have depleted protective microbiomes, whereas wild relatives may hold promise for new microbiome-based biological controls. The goal was to compare metapangenomes enriched from 7 Musa genotypes, including wild and cultivated varieties grown in sympatry, to assess the host associations with root and leaf endosphere functional profiles.

resultsDensity gradients successfully generated culture-free microbial enrichment, dominated by bacteria, with all together 24,325 species or strains distinguished, and 1.7 million metagenomic scaffolds harboring 559,108 predicted gene clusters. About 20% of sequence reads did not match any taxon databases and ~ 62% of gene clusters could not be annotated to function. Most taxa and gene clusters were unshared between Musa genotypes. Root and corm tissues had significantly richer endosphere communities that were significantly different from leaf communities. Agrobacterium and Rhizobium were the most abundant in all samples while Chitinophagia and Actinomycetia were more abundant in roots and Flavobacteria in leaves. At the bacterial strain level, there were > 2000 taxa unique to each of M. acuminata (AAA genotype) and M. balbisiana (B-genotype), with the latter 'wild' relatives having richer taxa and functions. Gene ontology functional enrichment showed core beneficial functions aligned with those of other plants but also many specialized prospective beneficial functions not reported previously. Some gene clusters with plant-protective functions showed signatures of phylosymbiosis, suggesting long-standing associations or heritable microbiomes in Musa.

conclusionsMetapangenomics revealed key taxa and protective functions that appeared to be driven by genotype, perhaps contributing to host resistance differences. The recovery of rich novel taxa and gene clusters provides a baseline dataset for future experiments in planta or in vivo bacterization or engineering of wild host endophytes.

Indexed as

BananaDisease protectionDiversityEndophytic bacteriaEndosphereMetagenomicsMetapangenomicsMicrobiomeMusa balbisianaPandemic disease

Identifiers

PMID37085932
PMCPMC10120106
OpenAlexW4366691204

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.