ArticleMicrobiome2023
Gauge your phage: benchmarking of bacteriophage identification tools in metagenomic sequencing data.
Article in Microbiome, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
34 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 56 citations in OpenAlex.
- Antimicrobial resistance crisis: could artificial intelligence be the solution?Military Medical Research · 2024Pooled it
- Phylogeny-agnostic strain-level prediction of phage-host interactions from genomes using machine learning.Nature microbiology · 2026Article
- Phage bioinformatics tools: a review of computational approaches for bacteriophage research.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence in Bacteriophage Science: A Comprehensive Narrative Review of Applications, Challenges, and Translational Opportunities.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Review
- Characterization and evaluation of a phage cocktail targeting Salmonella enterica in a Turkey farm.BMC microbiology · 2026Article
- Identification and comparative genomic analysis of prophage sequences and CRISPR‒Cas immunity in Methylococcus genomes: insights into industrial methane bioconversion.Biotechnology for biofuels and bioproducts · 2026Article
- Bacteriophages in gut metagenomes: from analysis to application.Virology journal · 2026Review
- Lowered Abundance of Gut Bacteriophage Species Is Associated With Human Cancer Cachexia.Journal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle · 2026Article
- ViromeXplore: integrative workflows for complete and reproducible virome characterization.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2025Article
- Phage quest: a beginner's guide to explore viral diversity in the prokaryotic world.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2025Review
- Biases and complementarity in gut viromes obtained from bulk and virus-like particle-enriched metagenomic sequencing.Microbiology spectrum · 2025Article
- Negativeome characterization and decontamination in early-life virome studies.Nature communications · 2025Article
- VirNucPro: an identifier for the identification of viral short sequences using six-frame translation and large language models.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2025Article
- Insights into diversity, host-range, and temporal stability of Bacteroides and Phocaeicola prophages.BMC microbiology · 2025Article
- Genomic insights into bacteriophages: a new frontier in AMR detection and phage therapy.Briefings in functional genomics · 2025Review
- Metagenomic and metatranscriptomic profiling of bronchoalveolar lavage fluid identifies microbial and host biomarkers of drug-resistant tuberculosis.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025Article
- ProkBERT PhaStyle: accurate phage lifestyle prediction with pretrained genomic language models.Bioinformatics advances · 2025Article
- A novel framework for phage-host prediction via logical probability theory and network sparsification.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2024Article
- Predicting phage-host interactions via feature augmentation and regional graph convolution.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe prediction of bacteriophage sequences in metagenomic datasets has become a topic of considerable interest, leading to the development of many novel bioinformatic tools. A comparative analysis of ten state-of-the-art phage identification tools was performed to inform their usage in microbiome research.
methodsArtificial contigs generated from complete RefSeq genomes representing phages, plasmids, and chromosomes, and a previously sequenced mock community containing four phage species, were used to evaluate the precision, recall, and F1 scores of the tools. We also generated a dataset of randomly shuffled sequences to quantify false-positive calls. In addition, a set of previously simulated viromes was used to assess diversity bias in each tool's output.
resultsVIBRANT and VirSorter2 achieved the highest F1 scores (0.93) in the RefSeq artificial contigs dataset, with several other tools also performing well. Kraken2 had the highest F1 score (0.86) in the mock community benchmark by a large margin (0.3 higher than DeepVirFinder in second place), mainly due to its high precision (0.96). Generally, k-mer-based tools performed better than reference similarity tools and gene-based methods. Several tools, most notably PPR-Meta, called a high number of false positives in the randomly shuffled sequences. When analysing the diversity of the genomes that each tool predicted from a virome set, most tools produced a viral genome set that had similar alpha- and beta-diversity patterns to the original population, with Seeker being a notable exception.
conclusionsThis study provides key metrics used to assess performance of phage detection tools, offers a framework for further comparison of additional viral discovery tools, and discusses optimal strategies for using these tools. We highlight that the choice of tool for identification of phages in metagenomic datasets, as well as their parameters, can bias the results and provide pointers for different use case scenarios. We have also made our benchmarking dataset available for download in order to facilitate future comparisons of phage identification tools. Video Abstract.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.