Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37085889›Full record

ArticleHuman genomics2023

The X-factor in ART: does the use of assisted reproductive technologies influence DNA methylation on the X chromosome?

Julia Romanowska, Haakon E Nustad, Christian M Page, William R P Denault, Yunsung Lee, Maria C Magnus, Kristine L Haftorn, Miriam Gjerdevik, Boris Novakovic, Richard Saffery and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human genomics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 7 institutions in 3 countries.

Julia RomanowskaCentre for Fertility and Health, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway. Julia.Romanowska@uib.no.
Haakon E NustadCentre for Fertility and Health, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.
Christian M PageCentre for Fertility and Health, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.
William R P DenaultCentre for Fertility and Health, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.
Yunsung LeeCentre for Fertility and Health, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.
Maria C MagnusCentre for Fertility and Health, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.
Kristine L HaftornCentre for Fertility and Health, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.
Miriam GjerdevikCentre for Fertility and Health, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.
Boris NovakovicMurdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia.
Richard SafferyMurdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia.
Håkon K GjessingCentre for Fertility and Health, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.
Robert LyleCentre for Fertility and Health, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.
Per MagnusCentre for Fertility and Health, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.
Siri E HåbergCentre for Fertility and Health, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.
Astanand JugessurCentre for Fertility and Health, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.
Norwegian Institute of Public Health · NOHealthInsight · USMurdoch Children's Research Institute · AUUniversity of Chicago · USUniversity of Melbourne · AUUniversity of Oslo · NOWestern Norway University of Applied Sciences · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAssisted reproductive technologies (ART) may perturb DNA methylation (DNAm) in early embryonic development. Although a handful of epigenome-wide association studies of ART have been published, none have investigated CpGs on the X chromosome. To bridge this knowledge gap, we leveraged one of the largest collections of mother-father-newborn trios of ART and non-ART (natural) conceptions to date to investigate sex-specific DNAm differences on the X chromosome. The discovery cohort consisted of 982 ART and 963 non-ART trios from the Norwegian Mother, Father, and Child Cohort Study (MoBa). To verify our results from the MoBa cohort, we used an external cohort of 149 ART and 58 non-ART neonates from the Australian 'Clinical review of the Health of adults conceived following Assisted Reproductive Technologies' (CHART) study. The Illumina EPIC array was used to measure DNAm in both datasets. In the MoBa cohort, we performed a set of X-chromosome-wide association studies ('XWASs' hereafter) to search for sex-specific DNAm differences between ART and non-ART newborns. We tested several models to investigate the influence of various confounders, including parental DNAm. We also searched for differentially methylated regions (DMRs) and regions of co-methylation flanking the most significant CpGs. Additionally, we ran an analogous model to our main model on the external CHART dataset.

resultsIn the MoBa cohort, we found more differentially methylated CpGs and DMRs in girls than boys. Most of the associations persisted after controlling for parental DNAm and other confounders. Many of the significant CpGs and DMRs were in gene-promoter regions, and several of the genes linked to these CpGs are expressed in tissues relevant for both ART and sex (testis, placenta, and fallopian tube). We found no support for parental DNAm-dependent features as an explanation for the observed associations in the newborns. The most significant CpG in the boys-only analysis was in UBE2DNL, which is expressed in testes but with unknown function. The most significant CpGs in the girls-only analysis were in EIF2S3 and AMOT. These three loci also displayed differential DNAm in the CHART cohort.

conclusionsGenes that co-localized with the significant CpGs and DMRs associated with ART are implicated in several key biological processes (e.g., neurodevelopment) and disorders (e.g., intellectual disability and autism). These connections are particularly compelling in light of previous findings indicating that neurodevelopmental outcomes differ in ART-conceived children compared to those naturally conceived.

Indexed as

DNA MethylationEpigenesis, GeneticAdultAustraliaChildCohort StudiesFemaleGenome-Wide Association StudyHumansInfant, NewbornMalePregnancyAssisted reproductive technology (ART)DNA methylationEpigeneticsEpigenome-wide association studyFather and Child Cohort Study (MoBa)Illumina EPIC arrayThe Norwegian MotherTrio study designX chromosomeX chromosome inactivation (XCI)X-chromosome-wide association study (XWAS)

Identifiers

PMID37085889
PMCPMC10122315
OpenAlexW4366681143

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.