Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37085863›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2023

Production of vaccination videos in India: learnings from a science-art partnership.

Julia Burleson, Rohini Ganjoo, Sidharth Rath, Nilambar Rath, Ananya Bhaktaram, Amelia M Jamison, Neil Alperstein, Paola Pascual-Ferra, Daniel J Barnett, Satyanarayan Mohanty and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Julia BurlesonDepartment of Health, Behavior and Society, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA. jburles4@jhu.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-7494-7254
Rohini GanjooDepartment of Biomedical Laboratory Sciences, George Washington University, Ashburn, 20147, USA.
Sidharth RathSwasthya Plus Network, Chandrasekharpur, , Bhubaneswar, 751017, Odisha, India.
Nilambar RathOdishaLIVE, Samanta Vihar, Bhubaneswar, 751017, Odisha, India.
Ananya BhaktaramDepartment of Health, Behavior and Society, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA.
Amelia M JamisonDepartment of Health, Behavior and Society, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA.
Neil AlpersteinDepartment of Communication, Loyola University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD, 21210, USA.
Paola Pascual-FerraDepartment of Communication, Loyola University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD, 21210, USA.
Daniel J BarnettDepartment of Environmental Health & Engineering, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA.
Satyanarayan MohantyD-Cor (Development Corner) Consulting, Satya Nagar, Bhubaneswar, 751007, Odisha, India.
Manoj ParidaD-Cor (Development Corner) Consulting, Satya Nagar, Bhubaneswar, 751007, Odisha, India.
Peter OrtonWellflix Inc, Hillsborough, NC, 27278, USA.
Eleanor KluegelDepartment of Communication, Loyola University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD, 21210, USA.
Rajiv N RimalDepartment of Health, Behavior and Society, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA.
Johns Hopkins University · USUniversity of Maryland, Baltimore · USAnthem (United States) · USGeorge Washington University Virginia Campus · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCross-cultural communication, often conceptualized along culture and language dimensions, is an important issue for collaborative teams that include both scientists and artists. Such teams must balance the standardization needs of rigorous scientific methods, on the one hand, with openness for artistic creativity, on the other. The scientific literature does not provide clear guidance on how to structure such collaborations. DISCUSSION: We created eight videos manipulating the type of appeal, message tone, and gender of the vaccine promoter in a 2 × 2 × 2 between-subjects experiment. The four stages of the filmmaking process were 1) conceptualizing filmmaking and script writing through a scientific lens, 2) pilot testing and finalizing the script, 3) video production and editing, and 4) dissemination. We describe the process and learnings from a collaboration that included filmmakers, researchers, and vaccine experts from India and the United States in producing, disseminating, and evaluating videos that promoted vaccine uptake in Odisha, India.

conclusionsWhen projects require close collaborations between scientists and artists, committing to a unified vision is essential for facilitating open, bidirectional communication and building trust between the partners. Clearly denoting research boundaries ensures that the scientific needs of the project are met while simultaneously welcoming space for the filmmakers' creativity, fostering a sense of ownership, and enhancing the final product.

Indexed as

ArtLearningCommunicationHumansLanguageUnited StatesVaccinationCOVID-19Entertainment-education videosFilmmaking collaborationMessagingVaccinationVaccine hesitancy

Identifiers

PMID37085863
PMCPMC10119828
OpenAlexW4366742680

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.