ArticleBMC neurology2023
Developing DELPHI expert consensus rules for a digital twin model of acute stroke care in the neuro critical care unit.
Article in BMC neurology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- A MOOC-based and high-fidelity surgical simulation-integrated clinical internship mode in optometry teaching for ophthalmology graduate students.BMC medical education · 2026Trial
- Digital twin for neurological conditions: a systematic scoping review.Biomedical engineering letters · 2026Review
- Healthcare Digital Twins Across Scales: A Narrative Review and Five-Level Conceptual Framework.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Applications of digital twin technology in cardiometabolic disease management: a scoping review.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026Article
- International Delphi consensus on acute kidney injury: Foundations for AI-driven digital twin development in critical care nephrology.PloS one · 2026Article
- The Potential of Digital Twins in Stroke Care: A Systematic Review of Current Applications and Future Perspectives.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2026Review
- Medical Digital Twin: A Review on Technical Principles and Clinical Applications.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Digital Twins in Neuroscience.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024Article
- Article
- [Digital twin hospitals: transforming the future of healthcare].Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi · 2024Review
- Digital twins in medicine.Nature computational science · 2024Review
- Harnessing artificial intelligence in sepsis care: advances in early detection, personalized treatment, and real-time monitoring.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Review
- Developing a consensus-based motivational care pathway for individuals with lower limb fractures: a Delphi protocol.Frontiers in public health · 2024Article
- Gaining consensus on expert rule statements for acute respiratory failure digital twin patient model in intensive care unit using a Delphi method.Biomolecules & biomedicine · 2023Article
- Intelligent Digital Twins for Personalized Migraine Care.Journal of personalized medicine · 2023Review
- Developing DELPHI expert consensus rules for a digital twin model of acute stroke care in the neuro critical care unit.BMC neurology · 2023Article
- Development and usability testing of a patient digital twin for critical care education: a mixed methods study.Frontiers in medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionDigital twins, a form of artificial intelligence, are virtual representations of the physical world. In the past 20 years, digital twins have been utilized to track wind turbines' operations, monitor spacecraft's status, and even create a model of the Earth for climate research. While digital twins hold much promise for the neurocritical care unit, the question remains on how to best establish the rules that govern these models. This model will expand on our group's existing digital twin model for the treatment of sepsis.
methodsThe authors of this project collaborated to create a Direct Acyclic Graph (DAG) and an initial series of 20 DELPHI statements, each with six accompanying sub-statements that captured the pathophysiology surrounding the management of acute ischemic strokes in the practice of Neurocritical Care (NCC). Agreement from a panel of 18 experts in the field of NCC was collected through a 7-point Likert scale with consensus defined a-priori by ≥ 80% selection of a 6 ("agree") or 7 ("strongly agree"). The endpoint of the study was defined as the completion of three separate rounds of DELPHI consensus. DELPHI statements that had met consensus would not be included in subsequent rounds of DELPHI consensus. The authors refined DELPHI statements that did not reach consensus with the guidance of de-identified expert comments for subsequent rounds of DELPHI. All DELPHI statements that reached consensus by the end of three rounds of DELPHI consensus would go on to be used to inform the construction of the digital twin model.
resultsAfter the completion of three rounds of DELPHI, 93 (77.5%) statements reached consensus, 11 (9.2%) statements were excluded, and 16 (13.3%) statements did not reach a consensus of the original 120 DELPHI statements.
conclusionThis descriptive study demonstrates the use of the DELPHI process to generate consensus among experts and establish a set of rules for the development of a digital twin model for use in the neurologic ICU. Compared to associative models of AI, which develop rules based on finding associations in datasets, digital twin AI created by the DELPHI process are easily interpretable models based on a current understanding of underlying physiology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.