Trial reportBMC oral health2023
Three-dimensional facial swelling evaluation of piezo-electric vs conventional drilling bur surgery of impacted lower third molar: a randomized clinical trial.
Trial report in BMC oral health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05488028 (Three-dimensional Facial Swelling Evaluation of Piezo-electric Versus Conventional Drilling Bur Surgery of Impacted Lower Third Molar), which is not on this map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Three-dimensional Facial Swelling Evaluation of Piezo-electric Versus Conventional Drilling Bur Surgery of Impacted Lower Third Molar: a Randomized Clinical Trial
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficacy of Submucosal Polydeoxyribonucleotide Injection after Impacted Mandibular Third Molar Extraction: A Randomized Controlled Trial.Yonsei medical journal · 2026Trial
- Comparative effects of hydrogen peroxide (Nanosil) and chlorhexidine mouthwashes on healing and pain after impacted mandibular third molar surgery: a randomized clinical trial.BMC oral health · 2025Trial
- Evaluation of the effect of manual lymphatic drainage method on edema, pain and trismus after impacted bilateral mandibular third molar surgery: a randomized clinical trial.BMC oral health · 2025Trial
- Three-dimensional facial scanning in oral and maxillofacial surgery: a scoping review of clinical applications, accuracy, and outcomes.Oral and maxillofacial surgery · 2026Article
- Evaluation of Different Surgical Removal Techniques for Impacted Mandibular Third Molar Impactions: A Comparative Study.Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences · 2025Article
- Clinical efficacy of magnet-assisted removal for dental high-speed dental handpiece broken Burs in mandibular third molar surgery: a retrospective study.BMC oral health · 2025Article
- Comparative Outcomes of Different Surgical Techniques for the Removal of Impacted Mandibular Third Molars.Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences · 2025Article
- Lingual plate thickness influences cortical bone injury during lower third molar extraction: A cone beam computed tomography study.Oral and maxillofacial surgery · 2025Article
- Piezoelectric and conventional rotary techniques for mandibular impacted third molar extraction: A comparative study.Bioinformation · 2025Article
- Piezosurgery in Third Molar Extractions: A Systematic Review.Journal of personalized medicine · 2024Review
- Smartphone applications for facial scanning: A technical and scoping review.Orthodontics & craniofacial research · 2024Article
- Automated pipeline for linear and volumetric assessment of facial swelling after third molar surgery.BMC oral health · 2024Article
- Enhancing Lower Third Molar Surgery: Using The Piezoelectric Technique for Superior Postoperative Outcomes and Complication Prevention.Dentistry journal · 2024Article
- Comparative Analysis of Surgical Techniques for Wisdom Tooth Extraction.Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences · 2024Article
- Evaluation of patient comfort and satisfaction after the surgical removal of mandibular impacted molars using a piezo-electric technique: A randomized double-blind clinical trial.Journal of oral biology and craniofacial researchArticle
- Trueness and precision of smartphone-based 3D scan in the assessment of facial edema in orthognathic surgery.Journal of oral biology and craniofacial researchArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAmong the post-surgical complications of lower wisdom teeth surgery, swelling is considered by patients one of the most impairing, with both social and biological influences and impacting patients' quality of life. Aim of the study was to evaluate the swelling following the osteotomy when performed with drilling burs versus piezo-electric instruments in the mandibular impacted third molar extraction, using a facial reconstruction software. MATERIALS AND
methodsA randomized, split-mouth, single-blind study was conducted on patients, ranging between 18 and 40 years of age, requiring lower third molars extraction and referred at the Oral Surgery Unit of the School of Dentistry of the University of Messina. Twenty-two patients were recruited during an 8 months period according to the following criteria: good general health conditions; bilateral, symmetrical, impacted third molars; no use of medication that would influence or alter wound healing; no temporomandibular joint disorder history; no smoking. All patients underwent bilateral surgical removal. For each patient, a facial scan was obtained prior to the surgical procedures. The two extractions were conducted performing, in a randomized way, osteotomy with rotatory burs or use of piezo surgical instruments. Facial scans were repeated at 3 and 7 days after the surgical procedures. Volumetric differences were calculated via superimposition using a dedicated software. The data obtained were processed using paired t-test.
resultsThe results obtained from our study showed no significant differences between two groups regarding post-operative swelling. To the best of our knowledge, this study represents the first experience of using an objective method that can be reproducible on the collection of patients' clinical parameters.
conclusionsThe 3D digital analysis, in the evaluation of facial swelling, is a technique of simple application, objective, reproducible, reliable, decreasing the variables of error. Based on these data, it is possible to conclude that piezo surgery is a safe way for performing the osteotomies during third molar surgery. However, regarding the post-operative swelling, it does not show an advantage over classical rotary instruments.
trial registrationRegistered on ClinicalTrials.gov (ID: NCT05488028, on 04/08/2022). Approved by Ethical Committee of Messina: (ID 01-2020, on 27/04/2020).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.