Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37085807›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2023

Face mask recommendations in schools did not impact COVID-19 incidence among 10-12-year-olds in Finland - joinpoint regression analysis.

Aapo Juutinen, Emmi Sarvikivi, Päivi Laukkanen-Nevala, Otto Helve

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Measures implemented in the school setting to contain the COVID-19 pandemic.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Risks and benefits of face masks in children.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Aapo JuutinenDepartment of Health Security, Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare, Mannerheimintie 166, 00271, Helsinki, Finland. aapo.juutinen@thl.fi.
Emmi SarvikiviDepartment of Health Security, Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare, Mannerheimintie 166, 00271, Helsinki, Finland.
Päivi Laukkanen-NevalaDepartment of Health Security, Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare, Mannerheimintie 166, 00271, Helsinki, Finland.
Otto HelveDepartment of Health Security, Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare, Mannerheimintie 166, 00271, Helsinki, Finland.
Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn autumn 2021 in Finland, a recommendation to use face masks was implemented nationwide in schools for pupils ages 12 years and above. While national guidelines were in form of recommendations, cities implemented mandatory masking in schools. Some cities extended this mandate for younger pupils as well. Our aim was to compare COVID-19 incidence among 10-12-year-olds between cities with different recommendations on the use of face masks in schools.

methodsCOVID-19 case numbers, defined as positive laboratory verified SARS-CoV-2 test results, were obtained from the National Infectious Disease Registry (NIDR) of the Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare. Helsinki, Turku and Tampere were selected for comparison since the baseline COVID-19 incidence in the cities had been similar in August and September 2021. Helsinki and Tampere implemented the national recommendation on face mask use at schools, while Turku extended this to include those 10 years old and above, starting from the beginning of semester in early August. Age groups of 7-9-year-olds, 10-12-year-olds and 30-49-year-olds were included in the statistical analysis and moving averages of 14-day incidences per 100 000 inhabitants were used as a dependent variable. Joinpoint regression was used to estimate average percent changes (APC) and average daily percent changes (ADPC) in the 14-day incidences. Differences in the ADPC values between the cities were compared in one-month periods. We also calculated cumulative incidences from the beginning of August to the end of November in the cities by age group.

resultsIn August, the ADPC was highest in Turku (3.9) and lowest in Tampere (2.0), while in September, the ADPC was highest in Turku (-0.3) and lowest in Helsinki (-3.2) among 10-12-year-olds. In October, the ADPC was highest in Helsinki (2.1) and lowest in Turku (-0.2) and in November, the ADPC was highest in Turku (4.1) and lowest in Tampere (-0.5) among 10-12-year-olds. We also calculated cumulative incidences from the beginning of August to the end of November in the cities by age groups of 7-9 years, 10-12 years, and 30-49 years. The cumulative incidence was highest in Turku in all age groups and lowest in Tampere.

conclusionsAccording to our analysis, no additional effect was gained from mandating face masks, based on comparisons between the cities and between the age groups of the unvaccinated children (10-12 years versus 7-9 years).

Indexed as

COVID-19ChildFinlandHumansIncidenceMasksRegression AnalysisSARS-CoV-2SchoolsChildrenCOVID-19Face masksFinlandSARS-CoV-2Surveillance

Identifiers

PMID37085807
PMCPMC10119008
OpenAlexW4366742371

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.