ArticleActa diabetologica2023
NT-proCNP levels predict higher atherosclerotic cardiovascular risk profile in patients with proliferative diabetic retinopathy.
Article in Acta diabetologica, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Investigation of serum C-type natriuretic peptide concentration at diagnosis and remission in pediatric osteosarcomas.European journal of pediatrics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimsIn this study, we aimed to demonstrate the effectiveness of serum amino-terminal proCNP (NT-proCNP) levels in predicting coronary heart disease (CHD) and cardiovascular risk in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients.
methodsWe recruited 73 patients with T2DM in the study. Additionally, we grouped the patients according to their status of diabetic retinopathy (DR) as no DR, non-proliferative DR, or proliferative DR. Serum NT-proCNP levels of the patients were measured and their atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk scores were calculated.
resultsThere was no significant difference in terms of NT-proCNP levels between the groups (p = 0.3) and in terms of CHD and ASCVD risk scores (p = 0.4 and p = 0.4, respectively). In the correlation analysis, a significant correlation was observed between the NT-proCNP levels and the ASCVD risk score (r = 0.373; p = 0.008 among the entire cohort and r = 0.555; p = 0.01 in the non-proliferative-DR group), smoking status (r = 0.280; p = 0.03 among the entire cohort and r = 0.362; p = 0.035 in the non-proliferative-DR group), sBP (r = 0.278; p = 0.038 among the entire cohort), and dBP (r = 0.284; p = 0.034 among the entire cohort and r = 0.482; p = 0.004 in the proliferative-DR group). In the ROC analysis, we found that the NT-proCNP level predicted a high ASCVD risk score with 83.3% sensitivity and 70.8% specificity and a very high ASCVD risk score with 100% sensitivity and 69.2% specificity among the proliferative-DR patients. No cut-off value was calculated for the prediction of high and very-high ASCVD risk scores in patients with non-proliferative DR. Similarly, no cut-off value was revealed for the prediction of established coronary artery disease in all groups.
conclusionsOur study revealed a significant association between NT-proCNP levels and high ASCVD risk scores in patients with proliferative DR.
Indexed as
Identifiers
37085633What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.