ArticleScientific reports2023
Effect of distance measures on confidences of t-SNE embeddings and its implications on clustering for scRNA-seq data.
Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Affinity of drug candidates binding to SARS-CoV-2 PLpro assessed using a generalized-ensemble method.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Coupling causality and interpretable machine learning to reveal the reaction coordinate of C-N coupling with a supramolecular Cu-calix[8]arene catalyst.Digital discovery · 2025Article
- Stereotyped Subclones Revealed by High-Density Single-Cell Lineage Tracing Support Robust Development.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025Article
- Logistic PCA explains differences between genome-scale metabolic models in terms of metabolic pathways.PLoS computational biology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Arguably one of the most famous dimensionality reduction algorithms of today is t-distributed stochastic neighbor embedding (t-SNE). Although being widely used for the visualization of scRNA-seq data, it is prone to errors as any algorithm and may lead to inaccurate interpretations of the visualized data. A reasonable way to avoid misinterpretations is to quantify the reliability of the visualizations. The focus of this work is first to find the best possible way to predict sample-based confidence scores for t-SNE embeddings and next, to use these confidence scores to improve the clustering algorithms. We adopt an RF regression algorithm using seven distance measures as features for having the sample-based confidence scores with a variety of different distance measures. The best configuration is used to assess the clustering improvement using K-means and Density-Based Spatial Clustering of Applications with Noise (DBSCAN) based on Adjusted Rank Index (ARI), Normalized Mutual Information (NMI), and accuracy (ACC) scores. The experimental results show that distance measures have a considerable effect on the precision of confidence scores and clustering performance can be improved substantially if these confidence scores are incorporated before the clustering algorithm. Our findings reveal the usefulness of these confidence scores on downstream analyses for scRNA-seq data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.