ArticleSpinal cord series and cases2023
Management of spasticity in individuals with spinal cord injury in the era of COVID-19 pandemic societal restrictions.
Article in Spinal cord series and cases, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
STUDY
designCross-sectional telephone interviews.
objectiveThe coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic placed unprecedented pressure on healthcare systems worldwide. Here, we aimed to investigate the disruptions in management of spasticity and activities of daily living (ADL) in individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI) during the COVID-19 pandemic.
settingTwo university hospitals in Istanbul, Turkey.
methodsTwenty-four individuals with SCI exhibiting moderate and severe spasticity were enroled. All participants underwent ultrasound-guided botulinum toxin type A (BoNT-A) injections at two centres. A self-rated spasticity survey prepared by the authors was conducted. We questioned whether there was an increase in spasticity and the need for new BoNT-A injections during the societal restrictions of the COVID-19 pandemic. Spasticity severity in the previous week was rated using a numeric rating scale (NRS). ADL disrupted by spasticity were assessed by asking open-ended questions.
resultsIn total, 75% participants reported a moderate increase in spasticity, 12.5% reported a severe increase, and 12.5% reported no difference. The mean spasticity NRS score was 6 (standard deviation = 2). Further, 87.5% (21) participants reported the need for BoNT-A treatment because of symptom re-emergence. When spasticity-induced deterioration in ADL was assessed, individuals mostly reported difficulties in walking, sitting on a wheelchair, and sleep disturbance due to spasticity.
conclusionsMost (87.5%) individuals with SCI reported a moderate or severe increase in spasticity during COVID-19 restrictions. Individuals with disabilities are an especially sensitive group and require specialised care during extraordinary circumstances, such as pandemics, hurricanes, or earthquakes. SPONSORSHIP: None.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.