Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37085478›Full record

SynthesisNutrition & diabetes2023

Sugar-sweetened beverages, low/no-calorie beverages, fruit juice and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease defined by fatty liver index: the SWEET project.

Novita D Naomi, Joy Ngo, Elske M Brouwer-Brolsma, Marion E C Buso, Sabita S Soedamah-Muthu, Carmen Pérez-Rodrigo, Joanne A Harrold, Jason C G Halford, Anne Raben, Johanna M Geleijnse and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Nutrition & diabetes, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Novita D NaomiDivision of Human Nutrition and Health, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-8141-4907
Joy NgoNutrition Research Foundation, Barcelona Science Park, Barcelona, Spain.
Elske M Brouwer-BrolsmaDivision of Human Nutrition and Health, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, the Netherlands.
Marion E C BusoDivision of Human Nutrition and Health, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, the Netherlands.
Sabita S Soedamah-MuthuCenter of Research on Psychological Disorders and Somatic Diseases (CORPS) Department of Medical and Clinical Psychology, Tilburg University, Tilburg, the Netherlands.
Carmen Pérez-RodrigoNutrition Research Foundation, Barcelona Science Park, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-4554-6184
Joanne A HarroldDepartment of Psychology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Jason C G HalfordDepartment of Psychology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Anne RabenDepartment of Nutrition, Exercise, and Sports, Faculty of Science, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-5229-4491
Johanna M GeleijnseDivision of Human Nutrition and Health, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-7638-0589
Lluis Serra-MajemResearch Institute of Biomedical and Health Sciences (IUIBS), University of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Preventive Medicine Service, Centro Hospitalario Universitario Insular Materno Infantil (CHUIMI), Canarian Health Service, Las Palmas, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-9658-9061
Edith J M FeskensDivision of Human Nutrition and Health, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, the Netherlands. edith.feskens@wur.nl.ORCID 0000-0001-5819-2488
Wageningen University & Research · NLTilburg University · NLUniversidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria · ESUniversity of Copenhagen · DKUniversity of Leeds · GBUniversity of Liverpool · GB

Funding

European Commission (EC) 774293
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSweetened beverage intake may play a role in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) development, but scientific evidence on their role is limited. This study examined associations between sugar-sweetened beverages (SSB), low/no-calorie beverages (LNCB) and fruit juice (FJ) intakes and NAFLD in four European studies.

methodsData for 42,024 participants of Lifelines Cohort, NQPlus, PREDIMED-Plus and Alpha Omega Cohort were cross-sectionally analysed. NAFLD was assessed using Fatty Liver Index (FLI) (≥60). Restricted cubic spline analyses were used to visualize dose-response associations in Lifelines Cohort. Cox proportional hazard regression analyses with robust variance were performed for associations in individual cohorts; data were pooled using random effects meta-analysis. Models were adjusted for demographic, lifestyle, and other dietary factors.

resultsEach additional serving of SSB per day was associated with a 7% higher FLI-defined NAFLD prevalence (95%CI 1.03-1.11). For LNCB, restricted cubic spline analysis showed a nonlinear association with FLI-defined NAFLD, with the association getting stronger when consuming ≤1 serving/day and levelling off at higher intake levels. Pooled Cox analysis showed that intake of >2 LNCB servings/week was positively associated with FLI-defined NAFLD (PR 1.38, 95% CI 1.15-1.61; reference: non-consumers). An inverse association was observed for FJ intake of ≤2 servings/week (PR 0.92, 95% CI: 0.88-0.97; reference: non-consumers), but not at higher intake levels. Theoretical replacement of SSB with FJ showed no significant association with FLI-defined NAFLD prevalence (PR 0.97, 95% CI 0.95-1.00), whereas an adverse association was observed when SSB was replaced with LNCB (PR 1.12, 95% CI 1.03-1.21).

conclusionsPooling results of this study showed that SSB and LNCB were positively associated with FLI-defined NAFLD prevalence. Theoretical replacement of SSB with LNCB was associated with higher FLI-defined NAFLD prevalence. An inverse association was observed between moderate intake of FJ and FLI-defined NAFLD. Our results should be interpreted with caution as reverse causality cannot be ruled out.

Indexed as

Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver DiseaseSugar-Sweetened BeveragesBeveragesEnergy IntakeFruit and Vegetable JuicesHumans

Identifiers

PMID37085478
PMCPMC10121594
OpenAlexW4366742124

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.