ArticleMicrobes and infection
Controlling viral inflammatory lesions by inhibiting fatty acid metabolism.
Article in Microbes and infection. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- HSV-1 metabolic hijacking: Mechanisms to precision therapeutics.Virulence · 2026Review
- Article
- Meeting the Challenge of Controlling Viral Immunopathology.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Herpes simplex virus infection is a major cause of vision loss in humans. Eye damaging consequences are often driven by inflammatory cells as a result of an immune response to the virus. In the present report, we have compared the effect of inhibiting energy metabolism with etomoxir (Etox), which acts on the fatty acid oxidation pathway and 2-Deoxy-d-glucose (2DG), which acts on glycolysis for their inhibitory effects on herpetic ocular lesions. Both drugs showed similar protective effects when therapy was started on the day of infection, but some 2DG recipients succumbed to encephalitis. In contrast, all Etox recipients remained healthy. Both drugs were compared for effects on inflammatory reactions in the trigeminal ganglion (TG), where virus replicates and then establishes latency. Results indicate that 2DG significantly reduced CD8 and CD4 Th1 T cells in the TG, whereas Etox had minimal or no effect on such cells, perhaps explaining why encephalitis occurred only in 2DG recipients. Unlike treatment with 2DG, Etox therapy was largely ineffective when started at the time of lesion expression. Reasons for the differential effects were discussed as was the relevance of combining metabolic reprogramming approaches to combat viral inflammatory lesions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.