Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37084745›Full record

ReviewThe lancet. Psychiatry2023

Common measures in mental health: a joint initiative by funders and journals.

Gregory K Farber, Suzanne Gage, Danielle Kemmer, Rory White

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The lancet. Psychiatry, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
15.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Constructs, Predictive Factors and Measures: Insights From the Mental Health in the Moment (MHIM) Co-Production Panel.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Core Variables Sets: Beyond Outcome Measures.Psychotherapy and psychosomatics · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Psychological Comorbidity in Patients Presenting to the Emergency Department With Low-Risk Chest Pain and Anxiety.Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2026
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Everyday functioning in treatment-resistant late-life depression: The mediating role of cognition.Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society : JINS · 2025
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Gregory K FarberThe National Institute of Mental Health, Rockville, MD, USA. Electronic address: farberg@mail.nih.gov.
Suzanne GageWellcome Trust, London, UK.
Danielle KemmerGraham Boeckh Foundation, Montreal, QC, Canada; International Alliance of Mental Health Research Funders, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Rory WhiteGraham Boeckh Foundation, Montreal, QC, Canada; International Alliance of Mental Health Research Funders, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Graham Boeckh Foundation · CANational Institute of Mental Health · USWellcome Trust · GB

Funding

Intramural NIH HHS Z99 MH999999Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is notable heterogeneity in how clinical and phenotypic data are measured by mental health researchers. There is a proliferation of self-report measures (eg, over 280 for depression alone), meaning it is challenging for researchers to compare findings across different studies from different laboratories. To begin to address this issue, a consortium of mental health research funders and journals has launched the Common Measures in Mental Health Science Initiative. The purpose of this endeavour is to identify common measures for mental health conditions that funders and journals can require all researchers to collect, in addition to any other measures they require for their specific study. These measures would not necessarily capture the full range of experiences of a given condition but could be used to link and compare across studies with different designs in different contexts. This Health Policy outlines the rationale, objectives, and potential challenges of this initiative, which aims to enhance the rigour and comparability of mental health research by promoting the adoption of standardised measures.

Indexed as

Mental HealthPeriodicals as TopicHealth PolicyHumansSelf Report

Identifiers

PMID37084745
PMCPMC10198931
OpenAlexW4366247300

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.