Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37084718›Full record

ArticleBiomedical physics & engineering express2023

Creation of waterproof, TLD probes for dose measurements to validate image-based radiopharmaceutical therapy dosimetry workflow.

David P Adam, Clifford Hammer, Julia Ziege Malyshev, Wesley S Culberson, Tyler J Bradshaw, Joseph J Grudzinski, Paul M Harari, Bryan P Bednarz

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomedical physics & engineering express, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 44% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

David P AdamDepartment of Medical Physics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, 53705, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-8282-6660
Clifford HammerDepartment of Medical Physics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, 53705, United States of America.
Julia Ziege MalyshevDepartment of Medical Physics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, 53705, United States of America.
Wesley S CulbersonDepartment of Medical Physics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, 53705, United States of America.
Tyler J BradshawDepartment of Radiology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, 53705, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-9549-7002
Joseph J GrudzinskiDepartment of Radiology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, 53705, United States of America.
Paul M HarariDepartment of Human Oncology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, 53705, United States of America.
Bryan P BednarzDepartment of Medical Physics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, 53705, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-7467-9816
University of Wisconsin–Madison · US

Funding

Radionuclide Production and Radiochemistry Core Description CoreP01CA250972 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI MORRIS, ZACHARY SCOTT, WEICHERT, JAMEY P · 2020 to 2024
$12.5M
NCI NIH HHS P01 CA250972
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Voxel-level dosimetry based on nuclear medicine images offers patient-specific personalization of radiopharmaceutical therapy (RPT) treatments. Clinical evidence is emerging demonstrating improvements in treatment precision in patients when voxel-level dosimetry is used compared to MIRD. Voxel-level dosimetry requires absolute quantification of activity concentrations in the patient, but images from SPECT/CT scanners are not quantitative and require calibration using nuclear medicine phantoms. While phantom studies can validate a scanner's ability to recover activity concentrations, these studies provide only a surrogate for the true metric of interest: absorbed doses. Measurements using thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs) are a versatile and accurate method of measuring absorbed dose. In this work, a TLD probe was manufactured that can fit into currently available nuclear medicine phantoms for the measurement of absorbed dose of RPT agents. Next, 748 MBq of I-131 was administered to a 16 ml hollow source sphere placed in a 6.4 L Jaszczak phantom in addition to six TLD probes, each holding 4 TLD-100 1 × 1 × 1 mm TLD-100 (LiF:Mg,Ti) microcubes. The phantom then underwent a SPECT/CT scan in accordance with a standard SPECT/CT imaging protocol for I-131. The SPECT/CT images were then input into a Monte Carlo based RPT dosimetry platform named RAPID and a three dimensional dose distribution in the phantom was estimated. Additionally, a GEANT4 benchmarking scenario (denoted 'idealized') was created using a stylized representation of the phantom. There was good agreement for all six probes, the differences between measurement and RAPID ranged between -5.5% and 0.9%. The difference between the measured and the idealized GEANT4 scenario was calculated and ranged from -4.3% and -20.5%. This work demonstrates good agreement between TLD measurements and RAPID. In addition, it introduces a novel TLD probe that can be easily introduced into clinical nuclear medicine workflows to provide QA of image-based dosimetry for RPT treatments.

Indexed as

Iodine RadioisotopesRadiopharmaceuticalsHumansRadiometryWorkflowIodine-131Iodine RadioisotopesRadiopharmaceuticalsdosimetryGEANT4Monte Carloradiopharmaceutical therapythermoluminescent dosimeters

Identifiers

PMID37084718
PMCPMC11186108
OpenAlexW4366728291

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.