Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37084350›Full record

ArticleGlobal spine journal2023

Geriatric Odontoid Fractures: Treatment Algorithms of the German Society for Orthopaedics and Trauma Based on Expert Consensus and a Systematic Review.

Georg Osterhoff, Matti Scholz, Alexander C Disch, Sebastian Katscher, Ulrich J A Spiegl, Klaus John Schnake, Max J Scheyerer

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Global spine journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Anterior Odontoid Screw Fixation: Current Advances in Indications and Techniques.Advances and technical standards in neurosurgery · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. [Treatment of geriatric odontoid fractures].Unfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Georg OsterhoffDepartment of Orthopaedics, Trauma and Plastic Surgery, University Hospital Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5051-0998
Matti ScholzATOS Orthopaedic Clinic Braunfels, Braunfels, Germany.
Alexander C DischUniversity Comprehensive Spine Center (UCSC), University Center for Orthopaedics, Traumatology & Plastic Surgery, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus at the TU Dresden, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8414-4041
Sebastian KatscherInterdisciplinary Center for Spine and Neurotrauma, Sana Klinikum Borna, Borna, Germany.
Ulrich J A SpieglDepartment of Orthopaedics, Trauma and Plastic Surgery, University Hospital Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Klaus John SchnakeCenter for Spinal and Scoliosis Surgery, Waldkrankenhaus Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany.
Max J ScheyererDepartment of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Koln, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1392-3990
University Hospital Leipzig · DEMalteser Waldkrankenhaus Erlangen · DESana Klinikum · DEUniversity Hospital Carl Gustav Carus · DEUniversity of Cologne · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

STUDY

designSystematic review/expert consensus.

objectivesFractures of the axis represent the most frequent injury of the spine in elderly patients. Both, operative and non-operative treatment are associated with a high rate of complications and mortality. The aim of this article was to summarize the current literature on the management of odontoid fractures in geriatric patients and to weigh it based on an expert consensus process.

methodsIn a joint consensus process, members of the Spine Section of the German Orthopaedic and Trauma Society (DGOU) aimed to formulate recommendations for the diagnostic workup and treatment of odontoid fractures in geriatric patients. Based on the previously published recommendations, this article is an updated version with incorporating a systematic review of the recent literature.

resultsBased on the new data available, the recommendations established in the initial consensus process were adapted.

conclusionsComputed tomography represents the diagnostic standard for patients with suspected injuries of the upper cervical spine. Anderson/D'Alonzo odontoid fractures type 1, non-displaced type 2, and type 3 can be treated conservatively. Even non-unions do not necessarily result in poor clinical outcome. In Anderson/D'Alonzo type 2 fractures, surgical therapy offers the advantage of relatively safe osseous healing with no increased complication rate even in elderly patients and can thus be recommended. In very high aged patients, however, a case-by-case decision should be made. When surgical stabilization of osteoporotic odontoid fractures is indicated, posterior techniques are biomechanically advantageous and can be considered the standard.

Indexed as

cervicalguidelinesodontoid fracturetreatment

Identifiers

PMID37084350
PMCPMC10177304
OpenAlexW4366606431

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.