ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2023
Deciphering associations between gut microbiota and clinical factors using microbial modules.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Large-scale transcriptome analysis reveals KIF20A as a novel indicator of cisplatin resistance in high-grade serous ovarian cancer.Journal of ovarian research · 2026Article
- Article
- MetaNet: a scalable and integrated tool for reproducible omics network analysis.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
- Effects of CP4-EPSPS-Containing Brassica juncea Hybrids on the Gut and Fecal Microbiota of the Terrestrial Decomposer Armadillidium vulgare.Microbial ecology · 2025Article
- Working together: gut microbe-microbe interactions shape host inflammation.Infection and immunity · 2025Review
- Disrupted microbial cross-feeding and altered L-phenylalanine consumption in people living with HIV.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2025Article
- Co-expression module analysis reveals high expression homogeneity for both coding and non-coding genes in sepsis.BMC genomics · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
motivationHuman gut microbiota plays a vital role in maintaining body health. The dysbiosis of gut microbiota is associated with a variety of diseases. It is critical to uncover the associations between gut microbiota and disease states as well as other intrinsic or environmental factors. However, inferring alterations of individual microbial taxa based on relative abundance data likely leads to false associations and conflicting discoveries in different studies. Moreover, the effects of underlying factors and microbe-microbe interactions could lead to the alteration of larger sets of taxa. It might be more robust to investigate gut microbiota using groups of related taxa instead of the composition of individual taxa.
resultsWe proposed a novel method to identify underlying microbial modules, i.e. groups of taxa with similar abundance patterns affected by a common latent factor, from longitudinal gut microbiota and applied it to inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). The identified modules demonstrated closer intragroup relationships, indicating potential microbe-microbe interactions and influences of underlying factors. Associations between the modules and several clinical factors were investigated, especially disease states. The IBD-associated modules performed better in stratifying the subjects compared with the relative abundance of individual taxa. The modules were further validated in external cohorts, demonstrating the efficacy of the proposed method in identifying general and robust microbial modules. The study reveals the benefit of considering the ecological effects in gut microbiota analysis and the great promise of linking clinical factors with underlying microbial modules. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: https://github.com/rwang-z/microbial_module.git.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.