ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2023
Effective design and inference for cell sorting and sequencing based massively parallel reporter assays.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- The adaptive landscapes of three globaleLife · 2026Article
- NaP-TRAP: A Versatile and Accessible Workflow to Dissect Principles of Translational Regulation and mRNA Stability.Current protocols · 2026Article
- NaP-TRAP: A versatile and accessible workflow to dissect principles of translational regulation and mRNA stability.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Mapping the phenotypic landscape of a transcriptional repressor using deep mutational scanning and growth-based quantitative sequencing.Nucleic acids research · 2026Article
- Accurate variant effect estimation in FACS-based deep mutational scanning data with Lilace.Genome biology · 2026Article
- The highly rugged yet navigable regulatory landscape of the bacterial transcription factor TetR.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Transfer learning for cross-context prediction of protein expression from 5'UTR sequence.Nucleic acids research · 2024Article
- Data hazards in synthetic biology.Synthetic biology (Oxford, England) · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
motivationThe ability to measure the phenotype of millions of different genetic designs using Massively Parallel Reporter Assays (MPRAs) has revolutionized our understanding of genotype-to-phenotype relationships and opened avenues for data-centric approaches to biological design. However, our knowledge of how best to design these costly experiments and the effect that our choices have on the quality of the data produced is lacking.
resultsIn this article, we tackle the issues of data quality and experimental design by developing FORECAST, a Python package that supports the accurate simulation of cell-sorting and sequencing-based MPRAs and robust maximum likelihood-based inference of genetic design function from MPRA data. We use FORECAST's capabilities to reveal rules for MPRA experimental design that help ensure accurate genotype-to-phenotype links and show how the simulation of MPRA experiments can help us better understand the limits of prediction accuracy when this data are used for training deep learning-based classifiers. As the scale and scope of MPRAs grows, tools like FORECAST will help ensure we make informed decisions during their development and the most of the data produced. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The FORECAST package is available at: https://gitlab.com/Pierre-Aurelien/forecast. Code for the deep learning analysis performed in this study is available at: https://gitlab.com/Pierre-Aurelien/rebeca.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.