Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37084251›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2023

Effective design and inference for cell sorting and sequencing based massively parallel reporter assays.

Pierre-Aurélien Gilliot, Thomas E Gorochowski

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Data hazards in synthetic biology.Synthetic biology (Oxford, England) · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Pierre-Aurélien GilliotSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1TQ, United Kingdom.
Thomas E GorochowskiSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1TQ, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-1702-786X

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

motivationThe ability to measure the phenotype of millions of different genetic designs using Massively Parallel Reporter Assays (MPRAs) has revolutionized our understanding of genotype-to-phenotype relationships and opened avenues for data-centric approaches to biological design. However, our knowledge of how best to design these costly experiments and the effect that our choices have on the quality of the data produced is lacking.

resultsIn this article, we tackle the issues of data quality and experimental design by developing FORECAST, a Python package that supports the accurate simulation of cell-sorting and sequencing-based MPRAs and robust maximum likelihood-based inference of genetic design function from MPRA data. We use FORECAST's capabilities to reveal rules for MPRA experimental design that help ensure accurate genotype-to-phenotype links and show how the simulation of MPRA experiments can help us better understand the limits of prediction accuracy when this data are used for training deep learning-based classifiers. As the scale and scope of MPRAs grows, tools like FORECAST will help ensure we make informed decisions during their development and the most of the data produced. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The FORECAST package is available at: https://gitlab.com/Pierre-Aurelien/forecast. Code for the deep learning analysis performed in this study is available at: https://gitlab.com/Pierre-Aurelien/rebeca.

Indexed as

High-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingSoftwareBiological AssayLikelihood FunctionsSequence Analysis, DNA

Identifiers

PMID37084251
PMCPMC10182853

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.