Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37084141›Full record

ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2023

"If only I had", patients' experiences during early oncology trials.

Maaike E A van Sasse van IJsselt, Diane A J van der Biessen, Andrea J van Puffelen, Debbie G J Robbrecht, Wendy H Oldenmenger

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Maaike E A van Sasse van IJsseltErasmus MC Cancer Institute, Department of Medical Oncology, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Diane A J van der BiessenErasmus MC Cancer Institute, Department of Medical Oncology, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. a.vanderbiessen@erasmusmc.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6981-246X
Andrea J van PuffelenErasmus MC Cancer Institute, Department of Medical Oncology, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Debbie G J RobbrechtErasmus MC Cancer Institute, Department of Medical Oncology, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2490-9991
Wendy H OldenmengerErasmus MC Cancer Institute, Department of Medical Oncology, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6855-6505

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeUntil today, it is not clear why patients decide to continue with early clinical trial (ECT) participation. Therefore, the aim of this study is to explore to which extent the self-determination theory of Ryan and Deci, according to the ECT enrollment phase, corresponds to the motivations of participants during ECT's.

methodsThis study has a qualitative design. Data were collected using semistructured interviews and were deductively analyzed in Nvivo12 using the thematic analysis approach of Braun and Clarke.

resultsAs a result of the deductive analysis performed, six themes and twenty subthemes emerged which matched the three personal needs: competence, relatedness, and autonomy (n = 11). "Competence" included the following themes: mixed future expectations, treatment expectations, and control of the outcome. "Relatedness" included the theme altruistic motivation. "Autonomy" included the themes; to live and act in harmony as well as mental and physical burden.

conclusionParticipants felt they tried everything and that they were treated to the limit. This not only gives the motivation to continue participating but also a sense of altruism. Despite different burdens, side-effects, and the feeling of being a test subject, the participants will not easily choose to stop participation in order to prevent saying afterwards: "If only I had".

Indexed as

MotivationNeoplasmsAltruismEmotionsHumansPersonal AutonomyQualitative ResearchEarly clinical trialsExpectationsExperiencesMotivationsOncology

Identifiers

PMID37084141
PMCPMC10121491

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.