Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37084097›Full record

Trial reportSurgical endoscopy2023

Intraoperative active and passive breaks during minimally invasive surgery influence upper extremity physical strain and physical stress response-A controlled, randomized cross-over, laboratory trial.

Tessy Luger, Rosina Bonsch, Robert Seibt, Bernhard Krämer, Monika A Rieger, Benjamin Steinhilber

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Surgical endoscopy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03715816 (Work Breaks During Minimally Invasive Surgery - Target-group Specific Development of Work Break Schedules), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03715816 nacompletednot on this map

Work Breaks During Minimally Invasive Surgery - Target-group Specific Development of Work Break Schedules

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity Hospital TuebingenRan2019 to 2020Enrolled21ConditionsWork-break SchedulesArmsWork break schedule
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Tessy LugerInstitute of Occupational and Social Medicine and Health Services Research, Eberhard Karls University and University Hospital Tübingen, Wilhelmstraße 27, 72074, Tübingen, Germany. tessy.luger@med.uni-tuebingen.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5718-251X
Rosina BonschInstitute of Occupational and Social Medicine and Health Services Research, Eberhard Karls University and University Hospital Tübingen, Wilhelmstraße 27, 72074, Tübingen, Germany.
Robert SeibtInstitute of Occupational and Social Medicine and Health Services Research, Eberhard Karls University and University Hospital Tübingen, Wilhelmstraße 27, 72074, Tübingen, Germany.
Bernhard KrämerDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Tübingen, Calwerstraße 7, 72076, Tübingen, Germany.
Monika A RiegerInstitute of Occupational and Social Medicine and Health Services Research, Eberhard Karls University and University Hospital Tübingen, Wilhelmstraße 27, 72074, Tübingen, Germany.
Benjamin SteinhilberInstitute of Occupational and Social Medicine and Health Services Research, Eberhard Karls University and University Hospital Tübingen, Wilhelmstraße 27, 72074, Tübingen, Germany.
University of Tübingen · DEBG Klinik Tübingen · DEUniversity Children's Hospital Tübingen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveInvestigate the effect of passive, active or no intra-operative work breaks on static, median and peak muscular activity, muscular fatigue, upper body postures, heart rate, and heart rate variability.

backgroundAlthough laparoscopic surgery is preferred over open surgery for the benefit of the patient, it puts the surgeons at higher risk for developing musculoskeletal disorders especially due to the less dynamic and awkward working posture. The organizational intervention intraoperative work break is a workplace strategy that has previously demonstrated positive effects in small-scale intervention studies.

methodsTwenty-one surgeons were exposed to three 90-min conditions: no breaks, 2.5-min passive (standing rest) or active (targeted stretching and mobilization exercises) breaks after 30-min work blocks. Muscular activity and fatigue of back, shoulder and forearm muscles were assessed by surface electromyography; upper body posture, i.e., spinal curvature, by inclination sensors; and heart rate and variability (HRV) by electrocardiography. Generalized estimating equations were used for statistical analyses. This study (NCT03715816) was conducted from March 2019 to October 2020.

resultsThe HRV-metric SDNN tended to be higher, but not statistically significantly, in the intervention conditions compared to the control condition. No statistically significant effects of both interventions were detected for muscular activity, joint angles or heart rate.

conclusionIntraoperative work breaks, whether passive or active, may counteract shoulder muscular fatigue and increase heart rate variability. This tendency may play a role in a reduced risk for developing work-related musculoskeletal disorders and acute physical stress responses.

Indexed as

LaparoscopyMusculoskeletal DiseasesElectromyographyHumansMuscle, SkeletalPostureShoulderUpper ExtremityElectromyographyGynecologyInterruptionsLaparoscopyWorking posture

Identifiers

PMID37084097
PMCPMC10120511
OpenAlexW4366602642

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.