Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37084002›Full record

ArticleUnfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany)2023

[Use of regional anesthesia for preoperative analgesia for proximal femoral fractures in the emergency department : A survey on current practice in German-speaking countries and the United Kingdom].

M Müller, O Passegger, P Zehnder, M Hanschen, E Muggleton, P Biberthaler, H Wegmann, F Greve

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Unfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 88% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

M MüllerFakultät für Medizin, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Klinik und Poliklinik für Unfallchirurgie, Technische Universität München, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, München, Deutschland. michael.mueller@mri.tum.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2764-4178
O PasseggerFakultät für Medizin, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Klinik und Poliklinik für Unfallchirurgie, Technische Universität München, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, München, Deutschland.
P ZehnderFakultät für Medizin, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Klinik und Poliklinik für Unfallchirurgie, Technische Universität München, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, München, Deutschland.
M HanschenFakultät für Medizin, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Klinik und Poliklinik für Unfallchirurgie, Technische Universität München, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, München, Deutschland.
E MuggletonFakultät für Medizin, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Klinik für Anästhesiologie, Technische Universität München, München, Deutschland.
P BiberthalerFakultät für Medizin, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Klinik und Poliklinik für Unfallchirurgie, Technische Universität München, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, München, Deutschland.
H WegmannFakultät für Medizin, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Klinik und Poliklinik für Unfallchirurgie, Technische Universität München, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, München, Deutschland.
F GreveFakultät für Medizin, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Klinik und Poliklinik für Unfallchirurgie, Technische Universität München, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, München, Deutschland.
TUM Klinikum · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRegional anesthesia (RA) techniques such as femoral nerve block (FNB) or fascia iliaca compartment block (FICB) are effective analgesia techniques in the treatment of pain from proximal femoral fractures (PFF). While in Great Britain (GB) these are already frequently used in the emergency department for preoperative analgesia, in the German-speaking D‑A-CH area (Germany, Austria, Switzerland) this seems to occur much less frequently. Therefore, the aim of this study was to survey the type and frequency of RA procedures used and to compare international practice. MATERIAL AND

methodsIn the D‑A-CH area as well as in GB, registered emergency departments were contacted and invited to participate in an online survey. The survey included questions on the frequency and type of RA procedures, reasons for non-use, equipment used, person performing the procedure and medications used.

resultsThe participation rate was 17.4% (142/818 emergency departments). RA procedures for preoperative analgesia in PFF were used in 18.3% (21/115) of hospitals in the D‑A-CH region and in 96.3% (26/27) in GB. The most commonly used block was the FICB in GB at 96.2% (25/26) and the FNB in Germany at 66.7% (14/21). In the D‑A-CH area, RA procedures are primarily performed by anesthesiology specialists 71.4% (15/21), and in GB by emergency department residents 65.4% (17/26). DISCUSSION: RA procedures are still performed too rarely following PFF in emergency departments in the D‑A-CH area. In international comparison with GB there is potential for improvement.

Indexed as

AnalgesiaAnesthesia, ConductionNerve BlockProximal Femoral FracturesEmergency Service, HospitalHumansPainUnited KingdomFascia iliaca compartment blockFemoral fractures close to the hip jointFemoral nerve blockGeriatric traumatologyProximal femoral fracturesRegional anesthesia

Identifiers

PMID37084002
OpenAlexW4366602899

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.