Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37083951›Full record

ArticleInvestigative ophthalmology & visual science2023

The Causal Effect of Education on Myopia: Evidence That More Exposure to Schooling, Rather Than Increased Age, Causes the Onset of Myopia.

Xiaohu Ding, Ian G Morgan, Yin Hu, Xianghua Tang, Jiayu Zhang, Lan Guo, Yangfeng Guo, Nali Deng, Xueying Du, Yingfeng Zheng and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. IMI-2025 Digest.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Myopia is predominantly genetic or predominantly environmental?Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Xiaohu DingState Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Guangzhou, China.
Ian G MorganState Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Guangzhou, China.
Yin HuState Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Guangzhou, China.
Xianghua TangState Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Guangzhou, China.
Jiayu ZhangDepartment of Medical Statistics and Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Lan GuoDepartment of Medical Statistics and Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Yangfeng GuoHealth Promotion Centre for Primary and Secondary Schools of Guangzhou Municipality, Guangzhou, China.
Nali DengHealth Promotion Centre for Primary and Secondary Schools of Guangzhou Municipality, Guangzhou, China.
Xueying DuHealth Promotion Centre for Primary and Secondary Schools of Guangzhou Municipality, Guangzhou, China.
Yingfeng ZhengState Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Guangzhou, China.
Mingguang HeState Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Guangzhou, China.
Ciyong LuDepartment of Medical Statistics and Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Xiao YangState Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Guangzhou, China.
Yizhi LiuState Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Guangzhou, China.
Sun Yat-sen University · CNGuangzhou Center for Disease Control and Prevention · CNAustralian National University · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To distinguish the effects of age and grade on the development of myopia. Methods: Grade 1 (n = 1465, mean age 6.71 ± 0.29 years; 53.5% male) and Grade 2 students (n = 1381, mean age 7.76 ± 0.30 years; 52.5% male) were examined in 2018, with a follow-up examination in 2019. Cycloplegic spherical equivalent (SE) in diopter (D) was measured. Regression discontinuity (RD) analysis was used to assess the causal effects on refraction at each visit. Results: The sample in a grade was divided into three 4-month age blocks according to their birth month, the youngest, middle, and the oldest. At the 2018 visit, within each grade, there were no significant differences in SE among age blocks (all P > 0.05), despite an age range of 12 months. However, comparing the youngest block in Grade 2 to the oldest block in Grade 1, an average age difference of four months, a significant difference in SE was found (0.82 ± 0.69 D vs. 1.05 ± 0.55 D, t-test P < 0.01). Formal RD analysis found a significant casual effect of grade increase on myopic refraction shift (β = -0.32 D; 95% CI, -0.73 to -0.01; P = 0.042). Consistent results were found using the 2019 data. Conclusions: Increased grade, rather than increasing age, is the major cause of myopic shifts in refraction. A causal link implies that interventions aimed at reducing the myopigenic exposures experienced during a school year have the potential to markedly reduce the myopic shifts in refraction associated with a grade of schooling.

Indexed as

MyopiaCausalityChildDisease ProgressionEducational StatusFemaleHumansInfantMaleRefraction, OcularVision Tests

Identifiers

PMID37083951
PMCPMC10132316
OpenAlexW4366603536

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.