ArticleInvestigative ophthalmology & visual science2023
Contrast Increment and Decrement Processing in Individuals With and Without Diabetes.
Article in Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Contrast Sensitivity Impairment in Diabetic Retinopathy: Clinical and Structural Correlates.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Exploring the Relationship Between Health Biomarkers and Performance on a Novel Color Perimetry Device in Prediabetes and Type 2 Diabetes.Diabetology · 2025Article
- The relationship between ON-OFF function and OCT structural and angiographic parameters in early diabetic retinal disease.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2025Article
- Advances in Structural and Functional Retinal Imaging and Biomarkers for Early Detection of Diabetic Retinopathy.Biomedicines · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Animal models suggest that ON retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) may be more vulnerable to diabetic insult than OFF cells. Using three psychophysical tasks to infer the function of ON and OFF RGCs, we hypothesized that functional responses to contrast increments will be preferentially affected in early diabetes mellitus (DM) compared to contrast decrement responses. Methods: Fifty-two people with DM (type 1 or type 2) (mean age = 34.8 years, range = 18-60 years) and 48 age-matched controls (mean age = 35.4 years, range = 18-60 years) participated. Experiment 1 measured contrast sensitivity to increments and decrements at four visual field locations. Experiments 2 and 3 measured visual temporal processing using (i) a response time (RT) task, and (ii) a temporal order judgment task. Mean RT and accuracy were collected for experiment 2, whereas experiment 3 measured temporal thresholds. Results: For experiment 1, the DM group showed reduced increment and decrement contrast sensitivity (F (1, 97) = 4.04, P = 0.047) especially for the central location. For experiment 2, those with DM demonstrated slower RT and lower response accuracies to increments and decrements (increments: U = 780, P = 0.01, decrements: U = 749, P = 0.005). For experiment 3, performance was similar between groups (F (1, 91) = 2.52, P = 0.137). Conclusions: When assessed cross-sectionally, nonselective functional consequences of retinal neuron damage are present in early DM, particularly for foveal testing. Whether increment-decrement functional indices relate to diabetic retinopathy (DR) progression or poorer visual prognosis in DM requires further study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.