Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37083924›Full record

ArticlePrevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research2023

Co-Regulation as a Support for Older Youth in the Context of Foster Care: a Scoping Review of the Literature.

Desiree W Murray, Hannah Rackers, Aleta Meyer, Kelly Jedd McKenzie, Karin Malm, Kristin Sepulveda, Catherine Heath

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. The Impact of Adversity and Family Conflict on Risk for Future Substance Use Among Young Adolescents in the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development Study (ABCD Study): A Cohort Analysis.Journal of child and adolescent psychiatric nursing : official publication of the Association of Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Nurses, Inc · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Desiree W MurrayCenter for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention, University of North Carolina, 1700 Martin Luther King Blvd, Campus, Box 7426, Chapel Hill, 27599, USA. desiree.murray@unc.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-1554-1665
Hannah RackersYouth Development and Child Welfare, Child Trends, Bethesda, MD, 20814, USA.
Aleta MeyerOffice of Planning, Research, and Evaluation, Administration for Children and Families, Washington DC, 20201, USA.
Kelly Jedd McKenzieOffice of Planning, Research, and Evaluation, Administration for Children and Families, Washington DC, 20201, USA.
Karin MalmYouth Development and Child Welfare, Child Trends, Bethesda, MD, 20814, USA.
Kristin SepulvedaYouth Development and Child Welfare, Child Trends, Bethesda, MD, 20814, USA.
Catherine HeathChildren's Bureau, Administration for Children and Families, Washington DC, 20201, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Co-regulation is a relatively new theoretical framework for interventions that connects developmental science to adolescent needs and provides strategies that can be applied across contexts. It also has value in shifting the focus of interventions to the role of relationships and interactions with caring adults, as well as supportive environments. This framework may be particularly salient for older youth with foster care experience whose relationships with adults and availability of developmental supports are disrupted. To understand how co-regulation aligns with current understanding of needs and supports for this population, we conducted a scoping review that involved systematically searching four databases, coding and charting relevant information, and actively engaging expert consultants and other stakeholders. Across 46 primarily descriptive articles, co-regulation was discussed most often in relation to relationships, as expected (89% of articles). Despite theoretical and empirical evidence of the benefits of supportive environments and intentional day-to-day interactions in promoting developmental skills and competencies, these two domains of co-regulation were referenced much less (39% and 28%, respectively). Results highlight opportunities for co-regulation supports that can be provided to older youth with foster care experience by caring adults and near-aged peers in a wide range of roles. Notable limitations in the literature were identified in applying co-regulation within the context of employment and career readiness, healthy relationships, and teen parenting. Also under-researched is the role of adult self-regulation skills and co-regulation approaches for youth from diverse backgrounds, including those who identify as LGBTQ or have disabilities. Considerations for practice and future research are provided.

Indexed as

Emotional RegulationEmploymentAdolescentAdultDatabases, FactualFoster Home CareHumansParentingPeer GroupCo-regulationFoster careYouth

Identifiers

PMID37083924
PMCPMC10423703

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.