ArticleInternational ophthalmology2023
Characteristics and differences of strabismus surgeries performed in private versus public settings: a national multicenter study.
Article in International ophthalmology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Privatization of ophthalmology: unveiling disparities in the surgical arena.Israel journal of health policy research · 2026Observational
- Association between eye disorders and the development of ADHD/ADD: a nationwide retrospective cohort study.Eye (London, England) · 2026Article
- The Israeli eye care system through a public and global health lens.Israel journal of health policy research · 2025Review
- Analysis of Strabismus Surgical Outcomes: A Retrospective Study of 2269 Cases from a Single Center.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2025Article
- Have gender and ethnic disparities in ophthalmology disappeared? Insights from a workforce-based study in Israel (2006-2021).Israel journal of health policy research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo investigate and compare the demographics, diagnoses, and surgical procedure types of strabismus repair in public and private hospitals in Israel in order to highlight possible disparities between them.
methodsRetrospective descriptive study included all strabismus surgeries in seven private hospitals, compared with two large public university-affiliated hospitals from June 2016 to June 2021. Electronic medical records were directly retrieved to produce an anonymized database.
resultsDuring the study period 2420 operations were performed. Patients who underwent strabismus surgery in public hospitals were older and had shorter procedures (p < 0.001 and p = 0.004, respectively). The median number of operated muscles and the prevalence of bilateral procedures were higher in private hospitals (p < 0.001 and p < 0.001, respectively). Surgery for common strabismus, especially esotropia, was more prevalent in private (p < 0.001), whereas surgery for vertical strabismus, cranial nerve palsies and complex syndromes were performed more often in public hospitals (p < 0.001, p = 0.008, and p < 0.001, respectively). Rectus recession and inferior oblique (IO) anteriorization were more predominant in private hospitals (p = 0.002 and p < 0.001, respectively), while recuts advancement and IO myectomies were more prevalent in public ones (p = 0.001 and p < 0.001, respectively). Reoperations were far more common in public hospitals (27.2% vs 6.2%, p < 0.0001). This was true across most age groups.
conclusionsCandidates for strabismus surgery in private hospitals in Israel are often younger, with more common diagnoses, and are usually referred for simpler procedures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.