Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37083430›Full record

ArticleSoft robotics2023

Biological Robots: Perspectives on an Emerging Interdisciplinary Field.

Douglas Blackiston, Sam Kriegman, Josh Bongard, Michael Levin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Soft robotics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. What is Balance? A Vital Mechano-Regulation Paradigm.Open mind : discoveries in cognitive science · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Open problems in synthetic multicellularity.NPJ systems biology and applications · 2024
    Article
  11. Minds in movement: embodied cognition in the age of artificial intelligence.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Douglas BlackistonDepartment of Biology, Allen Discovery Center at Tufts University, Medford, Massachusetts, USA.
Sam KriegmanInstitute for Computationally Designed Organisms, Massachusetts and Vermont, USA.
Josh BongardInstitute for Computationally Designed Organisms, Massachusetts and Vermont, USA.
Michael LevinDepartment of Biology, Allen Discovery Center at Tufts University, Medford, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7292-8084

Funding

Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency HR0011-18-2-0022National Science Foundation CBET-0939511
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Advances in science and engineering often reveal the limitations of classical approaches initially used to understand, predict, and control phenomena. With progress, conceptual categories must often be re-evaluated to better track recently discovered invariants across disciplines. It is essential to refine frameworks and resolve conflicting boundaries between disciplines such that they better facilitate, not restrict, experimental approaches and capabilities. In this essay, we address specific questions and critiques which have arisen in response to our research program, which lies at the intersection of developmental biology, computer science, and robotics. In the context of biological machines and robots, we explore changes across concepts and previously distinct fields that are driven by recent advances in materials, information, and life sciences. Herein, each author provides their own perspective on the subject, framed by their own disciplinary training. We argue that as with computation, certain aspects of developmental biology and robotics are not tied to specific materials; rather, the consilience of these fields can help to shed light on issues of multiscale control, self-assembly, and relationships between form and function. We hope new fields can emerge as boundaries arising from technological limitations are overcome, furthering practical applications from regenerative medicine to useful synthetic living machines.

Indexed as

Biological Science DisciplinesRoboticsComputersEngineeringRegenerative Medicineanimal capbiorobotcomputer sciencedevelopmental biologyembryorobotsynthetic bioengineeringxenobot

Identifiers

PMID37083430
PMCPMC10442684

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.