Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37083317›Full record

Trial reportJournal of global health2023

Effects of proactive vs fixed community health care delivery on child health and access to care: a cluster randomised trial secondary endpoint analysis.

Caroline Whidden, Kassoum Kayentao, Naimatou Koné, Jenny Liu, Mohamed Bana Traoré, Djoumé Diakité, Mama Coumaré, Mohamed Berthé, Mahamadou Guindo, Brian Greenwood and 4 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of global health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02694055 (Proactive Community Case Management and Child Survival), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02694055 nacompletednot on this map

Proactive Community Case Management and Child Survival: A Cluster-Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of California, San FranciscoRan2016 to 2020Enrolled135,149ConditionsUnder-five Child Mortality, Access to Health CareArmsProactive Community Case Management, Integrated Community Case Management, Removal of point-of-care user fees, Infrastructure improvements at primary health centre, Training of primary health centre staff
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Caroline WhiddenDepartment of Disease Control, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Kassoum KayentaoDepartment of Research, Monitoring & Evaluation, Muso, Bamako, Mali.
Naimatou KonéDepartment of Research, Monitoring & Evaluation, Muso, Bamako, Mali.
Jenny LiuInstitute for Health & Aging, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
Mohamed Bana TraoréDepartment of Research, Monitoring & Evaluation, Muso, Bamako, Mali.
Djoumé DiakitéMuso, Bamako, Mali.
Mama CoumaréMinistère de la Santé et du Développement Social, Mali.
Mohamed BerthéMinistère de la Santé et du Développement Social, Mali.
Mahamadou GuindoMinistère de la Santé et du Développement Social, Mali.
Brian GreenwoodDepartment of Disease Control, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Daniel ChandramohanDepartment of Disease Control, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Clémence LeyratDepartment of Medical Statistics, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Emily TreleavenInstitute for Social Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Ari JohnsonMuso, Bamako, Mali.

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/T032448/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Professional community health workers (CHWs) can help achieve universal health coverage, although evidence gaps remain on how to optimise CHW service delivery. We conducted an unblinded, parallel, cluster randomised trial in rural Mali to determine whether proactive CHW delivery reduced mortality and improved access to health care among children under five years, compared to passive delivery. Here we report the secondary access endpoints. Methods: Beginning from 26-28 February 2017, 137 village-clusters were offered care by CHWs embedded in communities who were trained, paid, supervised, and integrated into a reinforced public-sector health system that did not charge user fees. Clusters were randomised (stratified on primary health centre catchment and distance) to care during CHWs during door-to-door home visits (intervention) or based at a fixed village site (control). We measured outcomes at baseline, 12-, 24-, and 36-month time points with surveys administered to all resident women aged 15-49 years. We used logistic regression with cluster-level random effects to estimate intention-to-treat and per-protocol effects over time on prompt (24-hour) treatment within the health sector. Results: Follow-up surveys between February 2018 and April 2020 generated 20 105 child-year observations. Across arms, prompt health sector treatment more than doubled compared to baseline. At 12 months, children in intervention clusters had 22% higher odds of receiving prompt health sector treatment than those in control (cluster-specific adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 1.22; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.06, 1.41, P = 0.005), or 4.7 percentage points higher (adjusted risk difference (aRD) = 0.047; 95% CI = 0.014, 0.080). We found no evidence of an effect at 24 or 36 months. Conclusions: CHW-led health system redesign likely drove the 2-fold increase in rapid child access to care. In this context, proactive home visits further improved early access during the first year but waned afterwards. Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02694055.

Indexed as

Child HealthCommunity Health ServicesChildChild, PreschoolCommunity Health WorkersFemaleHealth Services AccessibilityHumansMali

Identifiers

PMID37083317
PMCPMC10122537

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.