ArticleThe Laryngoscope2023
Machine Learning Analysis of Physical Activity Data to Classify Postural Dysfunction.
Article in The Laryngoscope, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The multiple uses of artificial intelligence in exercise programs: a narrative review.Frontiers in public health · 2025Pooled it
- The Evolution of Machine Learning Algorithms and Their Contribution to Physical Activity Management.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMachine learning (ML) analysis of biometric data in non-controlled environments is underexplored.
objectiveTo evaluate whether ML analysis of physical activity data can be employed to classify whether individuals have postural dysfunction in middle-aged and older individuals.
methodsA 1 week period of physical activity was measured by a waist-worn uni-axial accelerometer during the 2003-2004 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey sampling period. Features of physical activity along with basic demographic information (42 variables) were paired with ML models to predict the success or failure of a standard 30 s modified Romberg test during which participants had their eyes closed and stood upon a 3-inch compliant surface. Model performance was evaluated by area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC-ROC), balanced accuracy, and F1-score.
resultsThe cohort was comprised of 1625 participants ≥40 years (median age 61, IQR 51-71). Approximately half (47%) were diagnosed with postural dysfunction having failed the binarized (pass/fail) scoring mechanism of the modified Romberg exam. Five ML models were trained on the classification task, achieving AUC values ranging from 0.67 to 0.73. The support vector machine (SVM) and a gradient-boosted model, XGBoost, achieved the highest AUC of 0.73 (SD 0.71-0.75). Age was the most important variable for SVM classification, followed by four features that evaluated accelerometer counts at various thresholds, including those delineating total, moderate, and moderate-vigorous activity.
conclusionsML analysis of accelerometer-derived physical activity data to classify postural dysfunction in middle-aged and older individuals is feasible in real-world environments such as the home. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3 Laryngoscope, 133:3529-3533, 2023.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.