Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37082919›Full record

ReviewPediatrics2023

COVID-19 Vaccine Safety First Year Findings in Adolescents.

Elisabeth M Hesse, Anne Hause, Tanya Myers, John R Su, Paige Marquez, Bicheng Zhang, Margaret M Cortese, Andrea Thames-Allen, Christine R Curtis, Susan A Maloney and 8 more

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pediatrics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. MIS-C: Diagnosis, Management, and Outcomes.Open forum infectious diseases · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Elisabeth M HesseCDC COVID-19 Response, Atlanta, Georgia.
Anne HauseCDC COVID-19 Response, Atlanta, Georgia.
Tanya MyersCDC COVID-19 Response, Atlanta, Georgia.
John R SuCDC COVID-19 Response, Atlanta, Georgia.
Paige MarquezCDC COVID-19 Response, Atlanta, Georgia.
Bicheng ZhangCDC COVID-19 Response, Atlanta, Georgia.
Margaret M CorteseCDC COVID-19 Response, Atlanta, Georgia.
Andrea Thames-AllenCDC COVID-19 Response, Atlanta, Georgia.
Christine R CurtisCDC COVID-19 Response, Atlanta, Georgia.
Susan A MaloneyCDC COVID-19 Response, Atlanta, Georgia.
Deborah ThompsonCenter for Biologics Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland.
Narayan NairCenter for Biologics Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland.
Meghna AlimchandaniCenter for Biologics Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland.
Manette NiuCenter for Biologics Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland.
Julianne GeeCDC COVID-19 Response, Atlanta, Georgia.
David K ShayCDC COVID-19 Response, Atlanta, Georgia.
Tom T ShimabukuroCDC COVID-19 Response, Atlanta, Georgia.
MIS-C REVIEW GROUP
Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research · US

Funding

Intramural CDC HHS CC999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectivesThe Food and Drug Administration expanded Emergency Use Authorization for use of Pfizer-BioNTech (BNT-162b2) coronavirus disease 2019 vaccine to include people ages 12 years and older on May 10, 2021. We describe adverse events observed during the first full year of the US coronavirus disease 2019 vaccination program for adolescents ages 12 to 17 years.

methodsWe conducted descriptive analyses using data from 2 complementary US vaccine safety monitoring systems: v-safe, a voluntary smartphone-based system that monitors reactions and health impacts, and the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), the national spontaneous reporting system. We reviewed reports and calculated adverse event reporting rates using vaccine administration data.

resultsAmong 172 032 adolescents ages 12 to 17 years enrolled in v-safe, most reported reactions following BNT-162b2 were mild to moderate, most frequently reported on the day after vaccination, and more common after dose 2. VAERS received 20 240 adverse event reports; 91.5% were nonserious. Among adverse events of interest, we verified 40 cases of multisystem inflammation syndrome in children (1.2 cases per million vaccinations), 34 (85%) of which had evidence of prior severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection; and 570 cases of myocarditis (17.7 cases per million vaccinations), most of whom (77%) reported symptom resolution at the time of report.

conclusionsDuring the first year BNT-162b2 was administered to adolescents ages 12 to 17 years, most reported adverse events were mild and appeared self-limited. Rates of myocarditis were lower than earlier reports. No new serious safety concerns were identified.

Indexed as

COVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesMyocarditisAdolescentAdverse Drug Reaction Reporting SystemsBNT162 VaccineChildHumansUnited StatesVaccinesBNT162 VaccineCOVID-19 VaccinesVaccines

Identifiers

PMID37082919
PMCPMC10262343
OpenAlexW4366603292

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.