ArticlePostepy psychiatrii neurologii2021
Real-life anti-smoking practices among Polish neurologists.
Article in Postepy psychiatrii neurologii, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: The aim of the present study was to assess attitudes of Polish neurologists towards cigarette smoking and their real-life anti-smoking practices. Methods: A study questionnaire was constructed, and distributed among Polish neurologists ( Results: Seventy five percent of the study group documented the smoking status of their patients in medical files. Two thirds of the study group collected data on patient's cigarette smoking during each visit. Only 54% and 22% of study participants routinely assessed the severity of tobacco dependence and diagnosed tobacco dependence according to the ICD-10 criteria, respectively. Two thirds of physicians declared routinely using any anti-smoking intervention, but only 12% used the recommended 5'A (Ask, Advice, Assess, Assist, Arrange) model of behavioral intervention and only 11% introduced Evidence Based Medicine (EBM)-supported pharmacotherapy. The vast majority of study participants (80%) did not try to increase their professional skills in anti-smoking interventions. Conclusions: Real-life anti-smoking practices among Polish neurologists are generally unsatisfactory and do not follow EBM-based guidelines. The low percentage of neurologists who diagnose and treat nicotine dependence may negatively impact the efficacy of secondary stroke prevention in Poland.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.