ArticleSexual medicine2023
Quantifying the number of US men with erectile dysfunction who are potential candidates for penile prosthesis implantation.
Article in Sexual medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Herbal dietary supplements for erectile dysfunction: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized-controlled trials.Journal of traditional and complementary medicine · 2026Article
- A population-based survey of self-reported and IIEF-defined erectile dysfunction among adult men in the United States in 2021.BMC public health · 2025Article
- Altered gray matter morphometry in psychogenic erectile dysfunction patients: A Surface-based morphometry study.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Economic impact of reduced postoperative visits after inflatable penile prosthesis implantation.Journal of comparative effectiveness research · 2025Article
- Gap in Sexual Dysfunction Management Between Male and Female Patients Seen in Primary Care: An Observational Study.Journal of general internal medicine · 2025Observational
- Patient out-of-pocket costs for guideline-recommended treatments for erectile dysfunction: a medicare cost modeling analysis.International journal of impotence research · 2025Article
- Changing trends in penile prosthesis implantation in China and an overview of postoperative outcomes from a single center.Basic and clinical andrology · 2024Article
- Emerging strategies for the prevention of bacterial biofilm in prosthetic surgery.Translational andrology and urology · 2024Review
- Safety profile and signal detection of phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors for erectile dysfunction: a Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System analysis.Sexual medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Penile prosthesis implantation (PPI) is a treatment option recommended in clinical guidelines for erectile dysfunction (ED). However, a limited number of urologists perform PPI procedures in the United States. Aim: To quantify the number of insured men with ED in the United States and project the number of potential candidates for PPI in 2022. Methods: An Excel-based disease impact model was constructed using a top-down estimation approach. The starting US male population consisted of adult men from 2022 US Census data after exclusion of age-specific mortality rates from the National Vital Statistics Reports. Men with health insurance were included in the model based on insurance status data from the US Census database. ED prevalence and ED treatment rates were obtained from administrative claims data analyses-the Merative MarketScan Commercial Database (18-64 years) and the 5% Medicare Standard Analytical Files (≥65 years)-and literature-based estimates of patient-reported ED prevalence. Outcomes: The number of men with ED in the United States and the number of potential candidates for PPI were estimated. Results: By utilizing ED prevalence based on administrative claims, an estimated 8.3% of insured men (10,302,540 estimated men [8,882,548 aged 18-64 years and 1,419,992 aged ≥65 years]) had a diagnosis of ED and sought ED care, out of 124,318,519 eligible US men aged ≥18 years in 2022. An estimated 17.1% of men with an ED diagnosis claim could benefit from PPI in 2022 (1,759,248 men aged ≥18 years). Patient self-reported ED prevalence across all ages ranged from 5.1% to 70.2%. Scenario analyses applying the patient self-reported ED prevalence range revealed the number of men in the United States who could benefit from PPI could have been higher than 1.7 million if their ED symptoms were diagnosed by health care providers. Clinical Implications: Most men with ED in the United States are undertreated, and many could benefit from PPI. Strengths and Limitations: This analysis is a US population-level estimation. However, given this study utilized a variety of assumptions, the results may vary if different model assumptions are applied. Conclusions: This disease impact model estimated that approximately 10.3 million men were diagnosed with ED by their health care providers and sought ED care in the United States in 2022. Of those, 1.7 million men could be PPI candidates and benefit from the treatment option.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.