ArticleAnnals of translational medicine2023
Predicting the occurrence of stress urinary incontinence after prolapse surgery: a machine learning-based model.
Article in Annals of translational medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparative Analysis of Logistic Regression and Machine Learning Algorithms for Predicting De Novo Stress Urinary Incontinence or Symptomatic Worsening Following Pelvic Floor Reconstruction: A Multicenter Study.International journal of women's health · 2026Article
- Predicting Postoperative Stress Urinary Incontinence After Prolapse Surgery via Machine Learning and Regression Models: Development and Validation Study.JMIR medical informatics · 2025Article
- Current advances in the use of artificial intelligence in predicting and managing urological complications.International urology and nephrology · 2024Review
- The International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire Short Form as a Substitute for 1-Hour Pad Weight Testing in the Evaluation of Urinary Incontinence in Patients With Pelvic Organ Prolapse Undergoing Surgery.International neurourology journal · 2024Article
- Efficacy of Transvaginal Surgery Using an ORIHIME Mesh With Wider Arms and Adjusted Length.Cureus · 2024Article
- The pelvic organ prolapse quantification system: stopping its application.Annals of translational medicine · 2023Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Previous prediction models for postoperative stress urinary incontinence (SUI) cannot be applied to patients receiving transvaginal mesh (TVM) surgery and colpocleisis or those with preoperative subject urinary incontinence. This study aimed to develop and validate a new machine learning model and compare it to previous models. Methods: Female patients who underwent prolapse surgeries for stage 2-4 anterior or apical prolapse between January 1, 2015, and December 31, 2019, at Peking Union Medical College Hospital were enrolled. Prolapse surgeries included native tissue repair, LeFort/colpocleisis, sacrocolpopexy, and TVM surgery. The existing models to predict postoperative SUI were externally validated. Subsequently, the dataset was randomly divided into 2 sets in a 4:1 ratio. The larger group was used to construct and internally validate models of logistic regression, random forest, and extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), which were then externally validated. The discrimination of the prediction models was evaluated using the area under the curve, while the calibration of the models was measured using the Spiegelhalter z test, mean absolute error (MSE), and calibration curves. Results: Overall, 555 patients were enrolled, and 116 experienced SUI 1 year postoperatively. Previous logistic models had poor performance, with areas under the curve of 0.544 and 0.586. In the model construction, the areas under the curve were 0.595, 0.842, and 0.714 for the logistic, random forest, and XGBoost models, respectively. However, only the XGBoost model exhibited good discrimination and calibration for both internal and external validations. Body mass index (BMI), C point of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) quantification stage, age, Aa point of POP quantification stage, and TVM surgery were the 5 most important predictors of postoperative SUI in the XGBoost model. Conclusions: Previous models had poor discrimination and calibration among a Chinese population. Hence, we developed and validated an XGBoost model, which performed well irrespective of the preoperative subjective urinary incontinence (preUI) and surgical methods. Further validation is still required.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.