ArticleAnnals of translational medicine2023
A retrospective comparative cohort study of ultra-pulse CO
Article in Annals of translational medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinical Outcomes of Fractional Carbon Dioxide Laser Treatment in Women With Vulvar Lichen Simplex Chronicus: A Retrospective Study With 12-Month Follow-Up.Lasers in surgery and medicine · 2026Article
- Fractional COLasers in surgery and medicine · 2026Observational
- Lichen Simplex Chronicus: Clinical Perspectives and Emerging Therapeutic Strategies.American journal of clinical dermatology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: A comparison of topical glucocorticoids with CO Methods: From November 2016 to July 2018, 178 cases of vulvar lichen simplex chronicus (LSC) or lichen sclerosus were confirmed with vulvar biopsy at our institute. Finally, 160 patients were enrolled in this trial. The patients were divided into 2 groups: a group treated with topical hormone and a group treated with CO Results: The PGI-C scores at 1, 3, and 6 months of treatment showed that the laser treatment group had remarkably superior outcomes to the glucocorticoid treatment group. The clinical efficacy score scale at 3- and 6-month treatments indicated a significantly greater curative effect in the laser than in the glucocorticoid treatment (P=0.006 and P=0.002 respectively). In the glucocorticoid group, the clinical effects of different pathological subtypes were significantly different following the 1- and 3-month treatments. The efficacy of treatment for LSC was better than that for lichen sclerosus. Following the 3- and 6-month treatments, the clinical effect for LSC was better than that of lichen sclerosus (3 months: 95% Conclusions: Ultrapulse CO
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.