ArticleHeliyon2023
Functional near infrared spectroscopy for brain functional connectivity analysis: A graph theoretic approach.
Article in Heliyon, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- EEG-defined differences in functional networks following beta-band transcranial alternating current stimulation in patients with disorders of consciousness: a pilot study.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2026Article
- Functional near-infrared spectroscopy assessment of the brain functional connectivity of sedated patients in the emergency intensive care unit.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Poverty and caregiver mental health are related to infant and toddler resting-state brain networks: insights from fNIRS.Neurophotonics · 2026Article
- TopoTempNet: A High-Accuracy and Interpretable Decoding Method for fNIRS-Based Motor Imagery.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- The Clinical Relevance of Artificial Intelligence in Migraine.Brain sciences · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy is an optical brain monitoring technique which uses NIRS to perform functional neuroimaging. It uses near-infrared light for measuring brain activity and to estimate the cortical hemodynamic activity in the brain due to motor activity. Functional NIRS measures the changes in oxygen levels in oxygenated and deoxygenated hemoglobin by optical absorption. One of the main challenges in the analysis of fNIRS signals is the signal degradation due to the interference from noise and artifacts from multiple sources. Methods: In this context, this research aims to analyze the connectivity between different regions of the brain using graph theory and hence the geometrical association of brain networks in terms of functional parameters. In this study, the impact of two noise removal processes (CBSI and TDDR), along with two types of correlation fNIRS such as Pearson's Correlation (PC), and Cross Correlation (CC) and various whole-brain network architectures on the reproducibility of graph measurements for individual participants has been carefully examined for different densities ranging from 5% to 50%.The graph measures' repeatability at the individual level was studied using the test-retest variability (TRT). Results: The test-retest variability for global measurements in binary networks was substantially large at low densities, regardless of the noise removal method or the kind of correlation. Very low test -reset values are observed for weighted networks and great reproducibility for measures of the entire graph. When comparing the test-retest values for various methods, the kind of correlation, the absolute value of the correlation, and the weight calculation method on the raw correlation value all had significant major effects. Conclusion: Based on a weighted network with the absolute cross correlation functioning as the weight, this study revealed that normalized global graph measurements were reliable. The node definition techniques that were utilized to remove noise were not essential for the normalized graph measures to be reproducible.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.