ArticleHeliyon2023
Influence of figure information on attention distribution in Chinese landscape painting.
Article in Heliyon, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Semantic Representation and Emotional Awareness in Chinese Painting Viewing: Is There a Difference Between Landscape Painting and Figure Painting?Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Chinese landscape painting is a complex form of visual art. More researchers pay more attention to the creation process and expressed intention of landscape painting. However, the appreciation of works of visual art is often related to cognitive processing, and it is influenced by the content of the works. This study hypothesized that the information of the figure in landscape paintings could guide the allocation of attention and affect cognitive processing. To test this hypothesis, the vertical landscape paintings of the Song and Ming Dynasties were used as experimental materials in the experiment, and the eye-movement technology was applied to record and compare the differences of the eye-movement indexes of landscape paintings with and without figures. The results showed that the dwell time of landscape painting with figure was significantly longer than that of landscape painting without figure, and the dwell time of the interest area of the figure was significantly longer than that of the interest area without figure. However, the first three fixation duration of the interest area with figures is significantly less than that of the interest area without figure, and there was no difference in the saccade counts and the distribution of fixation points between different landscape paintings. It suggested that the figure in the landscape painting can attract peoples' attention, but it does not have attention priority. Meanwhile, peoples tend to holistic processing when they viewing the vertical landscape paintings, and it is not influenced by the information of figure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.