Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37082514›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in plant science2022

AI-based object detection latest trends in remote sensing, multimedia and agriculture applications.

Saqib Ali Nawaz, Jingbing Li, Uzair Aslam Bhatti, Muhammad Usman Shoukat, Raza Muhammad Ahmad

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in plant science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Saqib Ali NawazSchool of Information and Communication Engineering, Hainan University, Haikou, China.
Jingbing LiSchool of Information and Communication Engineering, Hainan University, Haikou, China.
Uzair Aslam BhattiSchool of Information and Communication Engineering, Hainan University, Haikou, China.
Muhammad Usman ShoukatSchool of Automotive Engineering, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan, China.
Raza Muhammad AhmadCollege of Cyberspace Security, Hainan University, Haikou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Object detection is a vital research direction in machine vision and deep learning. The object detection technique based on deep understanding has achieved tremendous progress in feature extraction, image representation, classification, and recognition in recent years, due to this rapid growth of deep learning theory and technology. Scholars have proposed a series of methods for the object detection algorithm as well as improvements in data processing, network structure, loss function, and so on. In this paper, we introduce the characteristics of standard datasets and critical parameters of performance index evaluation, as well as the network structure and implementation methods of two-stage, single-stage, and other improved algorithms that are compared and analyzed. The latest improvement ideas of typical object detection algorithms based on deep learning are discussed and reached, from data enhancement,

Indexed as

algorithm improvementdata augmentationdeep learningnetwork structureobject detectiontransfer learning

Identifiers

PMID37082514
PMCPMC10112523

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.