Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37082501›Full record

ReviewCureus2023

Efficacy of Laser-Activated Irrigation Versus Ultrasonic-Activated Irrigation: A Systematic Review.

Vijetha Badami, Sneha Akarapu, Hemabhanu Kethineni, Satya Priya Mittapalli, Kasi Reddy Bala, Syeda Farha Fatima

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07387809 (Clinical Investigation of the Effectiveness of Laser-activated Photoacoustic Flow in One-visit Revision of Teeth With Apical Periodontitis), which is not on this map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07387809 naactive not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Clinical Investigation of the Effectiveness of Laser-activated Photoacoustic Flow in One-visit Revision of Teeth With Apical Periodontitis

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of ZagrebRan2024 to 2026Enrolled60ConditionsApical PeriodontitisArmsLaser activated irrigation, Sound-activated irrigation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Vijetha BadamiDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, MNR Dental College and Hospital, Hyderabad, IND.
Sneha AkarapuDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, MNR Dental College and Hospital, Hyderabad, IND.
Hemabhanu KethineniDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, MNR Dental College and Hospital, Hyderabad, IND.
Satya Priya MittapalliDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, MNR Dental College and Hospital, Hyderabad, IND.
Kasi Reddy BalaDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, MNR Dental College and Hospital, Hyderabad, IND.
Syeda Farha FatimaDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, MNR Dental College and Hospital, Hyderabad, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to conduct a systematic review and critical analysis of the evidence pertaining to the efficacy of laser-activated irrigation (LAI) versus ultrasonic-activated irrigation (UAI) in mature permanent teeth. A comprehensive literature search was performed using PubMed and Google Scholar. Additionally, a hand search was performed to identify relevant studies related to UAI and LAI. The search covered all articles published from January 1997 to December 2021. The identified studies were screened for eligibility using the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The included articles were then subjected to data extraction and analysis. The search yielded 1,637 results. Of these, 23 articles were included in this systematic review. All included articles were assessed for the outcomes of antimicrobial efficacy, smear layer, and dentin debris removal. The majority of the articles reported the superiority of LAI over UAI. Within the confines of this systematic review, the current evidence mandates that LAI has superior efficacy over UAI in the elimination of microorganisms, dentin debris, and smear layer from the root canal system.

Indexed as

antimicrobial efficacydentin debris removallaser-activated irrigationsmear layer removalultrasonic-activated irrigation

Identifiers

PMID37082501
PMCPMC10111875

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.