Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37082443›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neurology2023

Gait pattern analysis in the home environment as a key factor for the reliable assessment of shunt responsiveness in patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus.

Sandra Fernandes Dias, Christina Graf, Elisabeth Jehli, Markus Florian Oertel, Julia Mahler, Marianne Schmid Daners, Lennart Henning Stieglitz

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06722768 (Identifying Gait Changes From a Cerebrospinal Fluid Tap Test Using a Smart Insole in Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06722768 recruitingnot on this map

Identifying Gait Changes From a Cerebrospinal Fluid Tap Test Using a Smart Insole in Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus

TypeobservationalSponsorYonsei UniversityRan2021 to 2025Enrolled50ConditionsNormal Pressure Hydrocephalus
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sandra Fernandes DiasDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Hospital of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Christina GrafProduct Development Group Zurich, Department of Mechanical and Process Engineering, Eidgenoessische Technische Hochschule Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Elisabeth JehliDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Hospital of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Markus Florian OertelDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Hospital of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Julia MahlerDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Hospital of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Marianne Schmid DanersProduct Development Group Zurich, Department of Mechanical and Process Engineering, Eidgenoessische Technische Hochschule Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Lennart Henning StieglitzDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Hospital of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
University Hospital of Zurich · CHBoard of the Swiss Federal Institutes of Technology · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The identification of patients with gait disturbance associated with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH) is challenging. This is due to the multifactorial causes of gait disturbance in elderly people and the single moment examination of laboratory tests. Objective: We aimed to assess whether the use of gait sensors in a patient's home environment could help establish a reliable diagnostic tool to identify patients with iNPH by differentiating them from elderly healthy controls (EHC). Methods: Five wearable inertial measurement units were used in 11 patients with iNPH and 20 matched EHCs. Data were collected in the home environment for 72 h. Fifteen spatio-temporal gait parameters were analyzed. Patients were examined preoperatively and postoperatively. We performed an iNPH sub-group analysis to assess differences between responders vs. non-responders. We aimed to identify parameters that are able to predict a reliable response to VP-shunt placement. Results: Nine gait parameters significantly differ between EHC and patients with iNPH preoperatively. Postoperatively, patients with iNPH showed an improvement in the swing phase ( Conclusion: There was a significant difference in 60% of the analyzed gait parameters between EHC and patients with iNPH, with a clear improvement toward the normalization of the cadence and traveled arm distance postoperatively, and a clear improvement of the swing phase. Patients with iNPH with a good response to VP-shunt significantly differ from the non-responders with an ameliorated gait pattern.

Indexed as

gait disturbancegait patternidiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH)outcomesventriculo-peritoneal shunt (VP-shunt)

Identifiers

PMID37082443
PMCPMC10110860
OpenAlexW4362566664

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.