Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37082234›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of women's health2023

Using the WHO Self-Reporting Questionnaire-20 (SRQ-20) to Detect Symptoms of Common Mental Disorders among Pregnant Women in Vietnam: a Validation Study.

Trang Thi Hanh Do, Quyen Thi Tu Bui, Bui Thi Thu Ha, Thi Minh Le, Vui Thi Le, Quynh-Chi Thai Nguyen, Kimberly Joyce Lakin, Tung Thanh Dang, Loi Van Bui, Thien Cong Le and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of women's health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Trang Thi Hanh DoFaculty of Environmental and Occupational Health, Hanoi University of Public Health, Hanoi, Vietnam.ORCID 0000-0001-8896-6974
Quyen Thi Tu BuiFaculty and Fundamental Sciences, Hanoi University of Public Health, Hanoi, Vietnam.ORCID 0000-0002-5061-8488
Bui Thi Thu HaFaculty of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Hanoi University of Public Health, Hanoi, Vietnam.ORCID 0000-0003-2552-1614
Thi Minh LeFaculty of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Hanoi University of Public Health, Hanoi, Vietnam.ORCID 0000-0002-1017-6187
Vui Thi LeFaculty of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Hanoi University of Public Health, Hanoi, Vietnam.
Quynh-Chi Thai NguyenFaculty of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Hanoi University of Public Health, Hanoi, Vietnam.
Kimberly Joyce LakinNossal Institute for Global Health, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-6016-3416
Tung Thanh DangThe National Institute of Mental Health, Bach Mai Hospital, Hanoi, Vietnam.
Loi Van BuiThe National Institute of Mental Health, Bach Mai Hospital, Hanoi, Vietnam.
Thien Cong LeThe National Institute of Mental Health, Bach Mai Hospital, Hanoi, Vietnam.
An Thi Ha TranThe National Institute of Mental Health, Bach Mai Hospital, Hanoi, Vietnam.
Hien Thi Thu PhamThe National Institute of Mental Health, Bach Mai Hospital, Hanoi, Vietnam.
Tuan Van NguyenThe National Institute of Mental Health, Bach Mai Hospital, Hanoi, Vietnam.
Bạch Mai Hospital · VNHanoi University · VNThe George Institute for Global Health · AU

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/T023481/2Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Detection of antenatal common mental disorders in low-resource settings like Vietnam is important and requires a reliable, valid and practical screening tool. Currently, there is no such tool validated for use among pregnant women in Vietnam. This study aims to assess the validity of the Vietnamese version of the 20-item Self Reporting Questionnaire (SRQ-20) by evaluating its reliability, factorial structure, and performance in detecting common mental disorder (CMD) symptoms, thereby identifying the optimum cut-off score for CMD screening among pregnant women in Vietnam. Participants and Methods: A total of 210 pregnant women from four rural communes participated in a face-to-face interview using the Vietnamese version of the SRQ-20, followed by a clinical diagnostic interview based on ICD-10 diagnostic criteria of CMDs. The reliability of the SRQ-20 was assessed by calculating the scale's Cronbach's alpha to measure internal consistency. Factor analyses were undertaken to examine the factor structure of the instrument. The Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to assess the performance of the SRQ-20 against the clinical diagnosis and to identify the optimum cut-off score. Results: Internal consistency was good, with a Cronbach's alpha of 0.87. Factor analyses resulted in a 4-factor solution. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) for detection of CMDs was 0.90. The optimum cut-off score of the SRQ-20 for detection of CMD symptoms among Vietnamese pregnant women was 5/6. Conclusion: The Vietnamese version of the SRQ-20 has the capacity to detect CMDs among pregnant women effectively and is recommended for use as a screening tool for CMDs in antenatal care settings in Vietnam.

Indexed as

common mental disorderspregnant womenscreeningSRQ-20Vietnam

Identifiers

PMID37082234
PMCPMC10112468
OpenAlexW4365451002

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.