Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37082151›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in human neuroscience2023

Updating the relationship of the Ne/ERN to task-related behavior: A brief review and suggestions for future research.

Sara B LoTemplio, Clara Louise Lopes, Amy S McDonnell, Emily E Scott, Brennan R Payne, David L Strayer

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Sara B LoTemplioHuman Dimensions of Natural Resources, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, United States.
Clara Louise LopesDepartment of Psychology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States.
Amy S McDonnellDepartment of Psychology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States.
Emily E ScottDepartment of Psychology, Vermont State University, Johnson, VT, United States.
Brennan R PayneDepartment of Psychology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States.
David L StrayerDepartment of Psychology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States.
University of Utah · USColorado State University · USVermont State University

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The error negativity/error-related negativity (Ne/ERN) is one of the most well-studied event-related potential (ERP) components in the electroencephalography (EEG) literature. Peaking about 50 ms after the commission of an error, the Ne/ERN is a negative deflection in the ERP waveform that is thought to reflect error processing in the brain. While its relationships to trait constructs such as anxiety are well-documented, there is still little known about how the Ne/ERN may subsequently influence task-related behavior. In other words, does the occurrence of the Ne/ERN trigger any sort of error corrective process, or any other behavioral adaptation to avoid errors? Several theories have emerged to explain how the Ne/ERN may implement or affect behavior on a task, but evidence supporting each has been mixed. In the following manuscript, we review these theories, and then systematically discuss the reasons that there may be discrepancies in the literature. We review both the inherent biological factors of the neural regions that underlie error-processing in the brain, and some of the researcher-induced factors in analytic and experimental choices that may be exacerbating these discrepancies. We end with a table of recommendations for future researchers who aim to understand the relationship between the Ne/ERN and behavior.

Indexed as

anterior cingulate cortexbehaviorcognitive controlerror monitoringerror-related negativityperformance monitoringpost-error accuracypost-error slowing

Identifiers

PMID37082151
PMCPMC10110987
OpenAlexW4362549504

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.