Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37082111›Full record

ArticleWeed research2023

The utility of the 'Arable Weeds and Management in Europe' database: Challenges and opportunities of combining weed survey data at a European scale.

Helen Metcalfe, Jana Bürger, Christoph von Redwitz, Alicia Cirujeda, Silvia Fogliatto, Denise F Dostatny, Bärbel Gerowitt, Michael Glemnitz, José L González-Andújar, Eva Hernández Plaza and 9 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Weed research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Helen MetcalfeNet Zero and Resilient Farming, Rothamsted Research, West Common Harpenden Hertfordshire UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2862-0266
Jana BürgerCrop Health, Faculty of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences University of Rostock Rostock Germany.
Christoph von RedwitzInstitute for Plant Protection in Field Crops and Grassland, Julius Kuehn-Institut (JKI), Federal Research Centre for Cultivated Plants Braunschweig Germany.
Alicia CirujedaSistemas Agrícolas, Forestales y Medio Ambiente, Plant Protection, Agrifood Research and Technology Centre of Aragón (CITA) Zaragoza Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9646-8422
Silvia FogliattoDepartment of Agricultural, Forest and Food Sciences (DISAFA) University of Torino Grugliasco Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7309-8550
Denise F DostatnyPlant Breeding and Acclimatization Institute - National Research Institute, National Centre for Plant Genetic Resources Błonie Poland.
Bärbel GerowittCrop Health, Faculty of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences University of Rostock Rostock Germany.
Michael GlemnitzProvision of Biodiversity in Agrarian Systems Research Area II: "Land Use and Governance", Leibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research (ZALF) Müncheberg Müncheberg Germany.
José L González-AndújarInstituto de Agricultura Sostenible, Spanish National Research Council (CSIC) Córdoba Spain.
Eva Hernández PlazaDepartment of Plant Protection National Institute for Agricultural and Food Research and Technology, Spanish National Research Council (INIA-CSIC) Madrid Spain.
Jordi IzquierdoDepartment of Agrifood Engineering and Biotechnology Politechnical University of Catalunya Castelldefels Spain.
Michaela KolářováDepartment of Agroecology and Crop Production, Faculty of Agrobiology, Food and Natural Resources Czech University of Life Sciences Prague Praha - Suchdol Czech Republic.
Jevgenija ŅečajevaInstitute for Plant Protection Research 'Agrihorts' Latvia University of Life Sciences and Technologies Jelgava Latvia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0828-9721
Sandrine PetitAgroécologie, AgroSup Dijon, INRAE Université de Bourgogne Franche-Comté Dijon Cedex France.
Gyula PinkeFaculty of Agricultural and Food Sciences Széchenyi István University Mosonmagyaróvár Hungary.
Matthias SchumacherDepartment of Weed Science, Institute of Phytomedicine, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences University of Hohenheim Stuttgart Germany.
Lena UlberInstitute for Plant Protection in Field Crops and Grassland, Julius Kuehn-Institut (JKI), Federal Research Centre for Cultivated Plants Braunschweig Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2829-1527
Francesco VidottoDepartment of Agricultural, Forest and Food Sciences (DISAFA) University of Torino Grugliasco Italy.
Guillaume FriedPlant Health Laboratory Anses Montferrier-sur-Lez France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3653-195X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over the last 30 years, many studies have surveyed weed vegetation on arable land. The 'Arable Weeds and Management in Europe' (AWME) database is a collection of 36 of these surveys and the associated management data. Here, we review the challenges associated with combining disparate datasets and explore some of the opportunities for future research that present themselves thanks to the AWME database. We present three case studies repeating previously published national scale analyses with data from a larger spatial extent. The case studies, originally done in France, Germany and the UK, explore various aspects of weed ecology (community composition, management and environmental effects and within-field distributions) and use a range of statistical techniques (canonical correspondence analysis, redundancy analysis and generalised linear mixed models) to demonstrate the utility and versatility of the AWME database. We demonstrate that (i) the standardisation of abundance data to a common measure, before the analysis of the combined dataset, has little impact on the outcome of the analyses, (ii) the increased extent of environmental or management gradients allows for greater confidence in conclusions and (iii) the main conclusions of analyses done at different spatial scales remain consistent. These case studies demonstrate the utility of a Europe-wide weed survey database, for clarifying or extending results obtained from studies at smaller scales. This Europe-wide data collection offers many more opportunities for analysis that could not be addressed in smaller datasets; including questions about the effects of climate change, macro-ecological and biogeographical issues related to weed diversity as well as the dominance or rarity of specific weeds in Europe.

Indexed as

abundance measuresarable plantscover estimatesdata collectionmanagementnomenclatureplot sizesampling biasweed communityweeds

Identifiers

PMID37082111
PMCPMC10108295

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.