Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37082102›Full record

ArticleHuman reproduction open2023

Stimulating fertility awareness: the importance of getting the language right.

H Mertes, J Harper, J Boivin, M Ekstrand Ragnar, B Grace, M Moura-Ramos, S Rautakallio-Hokkanen, M Simopoulou, K Hammarberg, On Behalf Of The International Reproductive Health Education Collaboration Irhec

Abstract readEditorial
In one paragraph

Article in Human reproduction open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. F&S reports · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. What Does 'Preconception Health' Mean to People? A Public Consultation on Awareness and Use of Language.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

H MertesDepartment of Philosophy and Moral Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3029-2158
J HarperEGA Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6364-2367
J BoivinCardiff Fertility Studies Group, School of Psychology, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9498-1708
M Ekstrand RagnarDepartment of Health Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4735-6162
B GraceDepartment of Sexual and Reproductive Health, Faculty of Population Health Sciences, UCL Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5943-1700
M Moura-RamosCentro Hospitalar e Universitário de Coimbra, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7542-0497
S Rautakallio-HokkanenFertility Europe, Brussels, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6509-6320
M SimopoulouDepartment of Physiology, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1000-9100
K HammarbergSchool of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5988-5865
On Behalf Of The International Reproductive Health Education Collaboration Irhec

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While education about fertility is not intrinsically controversial, finding the right language to communicate the topic can be challenging, as there are several risks of unintended negative effects such as dissonance, anxiety, culpability, and stigma due to social norming. In this article, we share some of our learnings from promoting fertility awareness in the hope that they will inspire further debate and research on this topic. Starting from the ethical principles of respect for reproductive autonomy, avoiding harm (in terms of stigma or anxiety) and inclusivity, we have formulated five recommendations: (i) frame fertility awareness messages with (reproductive) autonomy in mind and aim to be inclusive of those who do not represent the traditional nuclear family; (ii) be empathetic and steer clear of blame; (iii) avoid scaremongering and offer a positive angle; (iv) give due consideration to both women and men in fertility health messaging; and (v) tailor the messages to particular contexts and audiences and develop resources in close collaboration with the target groups.

Indexed as

fertility awarenessfertility educationhealth communicationinclusionreproductive health

Identifiers

PMID37082102
PMCPMC10112336

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.