Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37082031›Full record

ReviewPostepy psychiatrii neurologii2021

Efficacy of home treatment of patients with mental disorders - a research review.

Marta Hat, Andrzej Cechnicki

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Postepy psychiatrii neurologii, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Marta HatPsychosis Research Unit, Association for the Development of Community Psychiatry and Care, Krakow, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8721-9827
Andrzej CechnickiCommunity Psychiatry and Psychosis Research Center, Chair of Psychiatry, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8476-7561
Centrum Leczenia Oparzeń · PLJagiellonian University · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study is to review research on the efficacy of home treatment for mental disorders compared to other forms of community-based treatment. The first section describes studies comparing treatment as usual with CMHT (Community Mental Health Team), the second section compares CMHT with more intensive forms of community-based care, such as CM (Case Management) and ACT (Assertive Community Treatment, and the third section focuses on interventions that are alternatives to hospitalization, described as CRT or MCHT (Crisis Resolution Team or Mobile Crisis Home Treatment). Views: The community-based model of psychiatric health care is nowadays recognized as the best systemic solution to improve its organization and functioning. In comprehensive care in the community, home treatment plays an important role. Treatment teams most often take the form of a general Community Mental Health Team - CMHT, which, like community mental health services in Poland, provides a wide range of interventions. There are several forms of treatment within CMHTs: ACT, CM, CRT and MHCT. Comment: Home treatment is more effective compared to standard inpatient and post-hospital care. Care under a Community Mental Health Team reduces the number and duration of hospitalizations and is characterized by higher treatment satisfaction. For patients with psychotic disorders, more intensive forms of community-based care - such as ACT, CM, and CRT - are particularly valuable and effective.

Indexed as

community psychiatryefficacyhome treatment

Identifiers

PMID37082031
PMCPMC9881613
OpenAlexW3185285151

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.