Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37081945›Full record

ArticleJAMIA open2023

Natural language processing-driven state machines to extract social factors from unstructured clinical documentation.

Katie S Allen, Dan R Hood, Jonathan Cummins, Suranga Kasturi, Eneida A Mendonca, Joshua R Vest

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMIA open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Katie S AllenCenter for Biomedical Informatics, Regenstrief Institute, Inc., Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6058-6280
Dan R HoodCenter for Biomedical Informatics, Regenstrief Institute, Inc., Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
Jonathan CumminsCenter for Biomedical Informatics, Regenstrief Institute, Inc., Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
Suranga KasturiCenter for Biomedical Informatics, Regenstrief Institute, Inc., Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
Eneida A MendoncaDivision of Biomedical Informatics, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4297-9221
Joshua R VestCenter for Biomedical Informatics, Regenstrief Institute, Inc., Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7226-9688

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: This study sought to create natural language processing algorithms to extract the presence of social factors from clinical text in 3 areas: (1) housing, (2) financial, and (3) unemployment. For generalizability, finalized models were validated on data from a separate health system for generalizability. Materials and Methods: Notes from 2 healthcare systems, representing a variety of note types, were utilized. To train models, the study utilized n-grams to identify keywords and implemented natural language processing (NLP) state machines across all note types. Manual review was conducted to determine performance. Sampling was based on a set percentage of notes, based on the prevalence of social need. Models were optimized over multiple training and evaluation cycles. Performance metrics were calculated using positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value, sensitivity, and specificity. Results: PPV for housing rose from 0.71 to 0.95 over 3 training runs. PPV for financial rose from 0.83 to 0.89 over 2 training iterations, while PPV for unemployment rose from 0.78 to 0.88 over 3 iterations. The test data resulted in PPVs of 0.94, 0.97, and 0.95 for housing, financial, and unemployment, respectively. Final specificity scores were 0.95, 0.97, and 0.95 for housing, financial, and unemployment, respectively. Discussion: We developed 3 rule-based NLP algorithms, trained across health systems. While this is a less sophisticated approach, the algorithms demonstrated a high degree of generalizability, maintaining >0.85 across all predictive performance metrics. Conclusion: The rule-based NLP algorithms demonstrated consistent performance in identifying 3 social factors within clinical text. These methods may be a part of a strategy to measure social factors within an institution.

Indexed as

clinical datanatural language processingsocial determinants of healthsocial factors

Identifiers

PMID37081945
PMCPMC10112959

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.