Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37081876›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in immunology2023

Decreased breadth of the antibody response to the spike protein of SARS-CoV-2 after repeated vaccination.

Lydia Horndler, Pilar Delgado, Salvador Romero-Pinedo, Marina Quesada, Ivaylo Balabanov, Rocío Laguna-Goya, Patricia Almendro-Vázquez, Miguel A Llamas, Manuel Fresno, Estela Paz-Artal and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. The durability of natural infection and vaccine-induced immunity against future infection by SARS-CoV-2.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Lydia HorndlerCentro de Biología Molecular Severo Ochoa, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC), Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Pilar DelgadoCentro de Biología Molecular Severo Ochoa, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC), Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Salvador Romero-PinedoVITRO SA, Granada, Spain.
Marina QuesadaVITRO SA, Granada, Spain.
Ivaylo BalabanovCentro de Biología Molecular Severo Ochoa, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC), Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Rocío Laguna-GoyaInstituto de Investigación Sanitaria Hospital 12 de Octubre (imas12), Madrid, Spain.
Patricia Almendro-VázquezInstituto de Investigación Sanitaria Hospital 12 de Octubre (imas12), Madrid, Spain.
Miguel A LlamasEmpíreo Diagnóstico Molecular, Madrid, Spain.
Manuel FresnoCentro de Biología Molecular Severo Ochoa, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC), Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Estela Paz-ArtalInstituto de Investigación Sanitaria Hospital 12 de Octubre (imas12), Madrid, Spain.
Hisse M van SantenCentro de Biología Molecular Severo Ochoa, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC), Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Stela Álvarez-FernándezVITRO SA, Granada, Spain.
Asunción OlmoVITRO SA, Granada, Spain.
Balbino AlarcónCentro de Biología Molecular Severo Ochoa, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC), Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas · ESResearch Institute Hospital 12 de Octubre · ESCentro de Biología Molecular Severo Ochoa · ESUniversidad Autónoma de Madrid · ESUniversidad Complutense de Madrid · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The rapid development of vaccines to prevent COVID-19 has raised the need to compare the capacity of different vaccines in terms of developing a protective humoral response. Previous studies have shown inconsistent results in this area, highlighting the importance of further research to evaluate the efficacy of different vaccines. Methods: This study utilized a highly sensitive and reliable flow cytometry method to measure the titers of IgG1 isotype antibodies in the blood of healthy volunteers after receiving one or two doses of various vaccines administered in Spain. The method was also used to simultaneously measure the reactivity of antibodies to the S protein of the original Wuhan strain and variants B.1.1.7 (Alpha), B.1.617.2 (Delta), and B.1.617.1 (Kappa). Results: Significant differences were observed in the titer of anti-S antibodies produced after a first dose of the vaccines ChAdOx1 nCov-19/AstraZeneca, mRNA-1273/Moderna, BNT162b2/Pfizer-BioNTech, and Ad26.COV.S/Janssen. Furthermore, a relative reduction in the reactivity of the sera with the Alpha, Delta, and Kappa variants, compared to the Wuhan strain, was observed after the second boosting immunization. Discussion: The findings of this study provide a comparison of different vaccines in terms of anti-S antibody generation and cast doubts on the convenience of repeated immunization with the same S protein sequence. The multiplexed capacity of the flow cytometry method utilized in this study allowed for a comprehensive evaluation of the efficacy of various vaccines in generating a protective humoral response. Future research could focus on the implications of these findings for the development of effective COVID-19 vaccination strategies.

Indexed as

COVID-19SARS-CoV-2AntibodiesAntibody FormationBNT162 VaccineChAdOx1 nCoV-19COVID-19 VaccinesHumansSpike Glycoprotein, CoronavirusVaccinationAntibodiesBNT162 VaccineChAdOx1 nCoV-19COVID-19 VaccinesSpike Glycoprotein, Coronavirusspike protein, SARS-CoV-2antibody breadthflow cytometry methodSARS-CoV-2S proteinvaccines

Identifiers

PMID37081876
PMCPMC10111966
OpenAlexW4362585171

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.