ReviewRegenerative biomaterials2023
3D printing of cell-delivery scaffolds for tissue regeneration.
Review in Regenerative biomaterials, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
35 citing papers in PubMed.
- Skin Relevant Biomaterials from Wound Healing, Medical Aesthetics, Flexible Electronics to Artificial Intelligence and Beyond.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2026Review
- Application of 3D-Bioprinting in Treatment of Chronic Wounds: A Review.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Transformation of the Biological Paradigm in Bone Regeneration: An Integrative Review.Journal of developmental biology · 2026Review
- Extraction, Characterization and Applications of Biopolymers from Sustainable Sources.Polymers · 2026Review
- Bio-inks for skin regeneration: phase-adaptive design, multifunctional platforms, and 4D bioprinting frontiers.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Review
- Vitronectin-GM-CSF fusion protein hydrogel with a recruitment-anchoring-activation strategy accelerates vascularized tissue regeneration.Regenerative biomaterials · 2026Article
- Pathology-guided design of injectable hydrogels for precision therapy and cartilage regeneration in osteoarthritis.Regenerative biomaterials · 2026Review
- Resolving the organ transplantation challenges by 3D bioprinting: A scoping review on case studies.Journal of education and health promotion · 2026Review
- Precise cell stratification in alginate/gelatin methacrylate based 3D construct using coaxial chaotic bioprinting.International journal of biological macromolecules · 2025Article
- Review
- From Medical Imaging to Bioprinted Tissues: The Importance of Workflow Optimisation for Improved Cell Function.Expert reviews in molecular medicine · 2025Review
- Future Frontiers in Bioinspired Implanted Biomaterials.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2025Review
- Review
- Evaluating the Biocompatibility and Efficacy of Absorbable Three-Dimensional Micro-Nanofiber Scaffolds for Volume Restoration Following Post-Mastectomy Breast Reconstruction: An Experimental Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Multi-Nozzles 3D Bioprinting Collagen/Thermoplastic Elasto-Mer Scaffold with Interconnect Pores.Micromachines · 2025Article
- Three-Dimensional Printing/Bioprinting and Cellular Therapies for Regenerative Medicine: Current Advances.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2025Review
- Advancements in nanohydroxyapatite: synthesis, biomedical applications and composite developments.Regenerative biomaterials · 2025Review
- Current status of nano-embedded growth factors and stem cells delivery to bone for targeted repair and regeneration.Journal of orthopaedic translation · 2025Review
- Biomaterials for neuroengineering: applications and challenges.Regenerative biomaterials · 2025Review
- Biodegradable polymeric occluder with controllable locking structure for closure of atrial septal defect via interventional treatment.Regenerative biomaterials · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Tissue engineering strategy that combine biomaterials with living cells has shown special advantages in tissue regeneration and promoted the development of regenerative medicine. In particular, the rising of 3D printing technology further enriched the structural design and composition of tissue engineering scaffolds, which also provided convenience for cell loading and cell delivery of living cells. In this review, two types of cell-delivery scaffolds for tissue regeneration, including 3D printed scaffolds with subsequent cell-seeding and 3D cells bioprinted scaffolds, are mainly reviewed. We devote a major part to present and discuss the recent advances of two 3D printed cell-delivery scaffolds in regeneration of various tissues, involving bone, cartilage, skin tissues etc. Although two types of 3D printed cell-delivery scaffolds have some shortcomings, they do have generally facilitated the exploration of tissue engineering scaffolds in multiple tissue regeneration. It is expected that 3D printed cell-delivery scaffolds will be further explored in function mechanism of seeding cells
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.