ReviewRegenerative biomaterials2023
Review in Regenerative biomaterials, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pro-Angiogenic Response to OsteoBiolBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- From bone replacement to regeneration. A biomaterials started journey.Materials today. Bio · 2026Review
- Micro/nano-structured titanium surfaces promote endothelial responses and angiogenic activity under zoledronic acid exposure.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Biomaterial Screening Identifies Enhanced Osteogenic and Angiogenic Potential of Mn-Doped Calcium Phosphate Coatings.ACS biomaterials science & engineering · 2026Article
- Graded Hydroxyapatite Triply Periodic Minimal Surface Structures for Bone Tissue Engineering Applications.Advanced healthcare materials · 2025Article
- An engineered M2 macrophage-derived exosomes-loaded electrospun biomimetic periosteum promotes cell recruitment, immunoregulation, and angiogenesis in bone regeneration.Bioactive materials · 2025Article
- Antioxidant scaffolds for enhanced bone regeneration: recent advances and challenges.Biomedical engineering online · 2025Review
- Bone-Mimetic Osteon Microtopographies on Poly-ε-Caprolactone Enhance the Osteogenic Potential of Human Mesenchymal Stem Cells.Macromolecular bioscience · 2025Article
- Dimensional effects of surface morphology and trapped air on mammalian cell adhesion to special wetting surfaces.Regenerative biomaterials · 2025Article
- Application of BMSCs-coated PLGA/type I collagen composite mesh in intraperitoneal onlay mesh repair using a rat ventral incisional hernia model.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Article
- Advances in 3D-Printed scaffolds for bone defect repair: material strategies and synergistic functional performance.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Review
- Advancements in nanohydroxyapatite: synthesis, biomedical applications and composite developments.Regenerative biomaterials · 2025Review
- Novel approach for biomaterial assessment: utilizing the Ex Ovo quail cam assay for biocompatibility pre-screening.Veterinary research communications · 2024Article
- Personalized bioceramic grafts for craniomaxillofacial bone regeneration.International journal of oral science · 2024Review
- Glycosaminoglycans Modulate the Angiogenic Ability of Type I Collagen-Based Scaffolds by Acting on Vascular Network Remodeling and Maturation.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Effect of agarose/gelatin gel addition on the pro-angiogenic potential of polyhydroxybutyrate/chitosan scaffolds.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2024Article
- Cancer cell response to extrinsic and intrinsic mechanical cue: opportunities for tumor apoptosis strategies.Regenerative biomaterials · 2024Review
- Challenges and Advances in Peripheral Nerve Tissue Engineering Critical Factors Affecting Nerve Regeneration.Journal of tissue engineering and regenerative medicine · 2024Review
- Advances in 3D printing technology for preparing bone tissue engineering scaffolds from biodegradable materials.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2024Article
- Biomimetic, biodegradable and osteoinductive treated dentin matrix/α-calcium sulphate hemihydrate composite material for bone tissue engineering.Regenerative biomaterials · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bone tissue engineering (BTE) aims to improve the healing of bone fractures using scaffolds that mimic the native extracellular matrix. For successful bone regeneration, scaffolds should promote simultaneous bone tissue formation and blood vessel growth for nutrient and waste exchange. However, a significant challenge in regenerative medicine remains the development of grafts that can be vascularized successfully. Amongst other things, optimization of physicochemical conditions of scaffolds is key to achieving appropriate angiogenesis in the period immediately following implantation. Calcium phosphates and collagen scaffolds are two of the most widely studied biomaterials for BTE, due to their close resemblance to inorganic and organic components of bone, respectively, and their bioactivity, tunable biodegradability and the ability to produce tailored architectures. While various strategies exist to enhance vascularization of these scaffolds
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.