Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37081495›Full record

ArticleBMC medical imaging2023

Automated classification of polyps using deep learning architectures and few-shot learning.

Adrian Krenzer, Stefan Heil, Daniel Fitting, Safa Matti, Wolfram G Zoller, Alexander Hann, Frank Puppe

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical imaging, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Machine Learning-Based Prediction of Histopathological Classification in Colorectal Polyps.The Turkish journal of gastroenterology : the official journal of Turkish Society of Gastroenterology · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Adrian KrenzerDepartment of Artificial Intelligence and Knowledge Systems, Julius-Maximilians University of Würzburg, Sanderring 2, 97070, Würzburg, Germany. adrian.krenzer@uni-wuerzburg.de.
Stefan HeilDepartment of Artificial Intelligence and Knowledge Systems, Julius-Maximilians University of Würzburg, Sanderring 2, 97070, Würzburg, Germany.
Daniel FittingInterventional and Experimental Endoscopy (InExEn), Department of Internal Medicine II, University Hospital Würzburg, Oberdürrbacher Straße 6, 97080, Würzburg, Germany.
Safa MattiDepartment of Artificial Intelligence and Knowledge Systems, Julius-Maximilians University of Würzburg, Sanderring 2, 97070, Würzburg, Germany.
Wolfram G ZollerDepartment of Internal Medicine and Gastroenterology, Katharinenhospital, Kriegsbergstrasse 60, 70174, Stuttgart, Germany.
Alexander HannInterventional and Experimental Endoscopy (InExEn), Department of Internal Medicine II, University Hospital Würzburg, Oberdürrbacher Straße 6, 97080, Würzburg, Germany.
Frank PuppeDepartment of Artificial Intelligence and Knowledge Systems, Julius-Maximilians University of Würzburg, Sanderring 2, 97070, Würzburg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundColorectal cancer is a leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. The best method to prevent CRC is a colonoscopy. However, not all colon polyps have the risk of becoming cancerous. Therefore, polyps are classified using different classification systems. After the classification, further treatment and procedures are based on the classification of the polyp. Nevertheless, classification is not easy. Therefore, we suggest two novel automated classifications system assisting gastroenterologists in classifying polyps based on the NICE and Paris classification.

methodsWe build two classification systems. One is classifying polyps based on their shape (Paris). The other classifies polyps based on their texture and surface patterns (NICE). A two-step process for the Paris classification is introduced: First, detecting and cropping the polyp on the image, and secondly, classifying the polyp based on the cropped area with a transformer network. For the NICE classification, we design a few-shot learning algorithm based on the Deep Metric Learning approach. The algorithm creates an embedding space for polyps, which allows classification from a few examples to account for the data scarcity of NICE annotated images in our database.

resultsFor the Paris classification, we achieve an accuracy of 89.35 %, surpassing all papers in the literature and establishing a new state-of-the-art and baseline accuracy for other publications on a public data set. For the NICE classification, we achieve a competitive accuracy of 81.13 % and demonstrate thereby the viability of the few-shot learning paradigm in polyp classification in data-scarce environments. Additionally, we show different ablations of the algorithms. Finally, we further elaborate on the explainability of the system by showing heat maps of the neural network explaining neural activations.

conclusionOverall we introduce two polyp classification systems to assist gastroenterologists. We achieve state-of-the-art performance in the Paris classification and demonstrate the viability of the few-shot learning paradigm in the NICE classification, addressing the prevalent data scarcity issues faced in medical machine learning.

Indexed as

Colonic PolypsDeep LearningAlgorithmsColonoscopyHumansNeural Networks, ComputerAutomationDeep learningDeep metric learningEndoscopyFew-shot learningGastroenterologyImage classificationMachine learningTransformer

Identifiers

PMID37081495
PMCPMC10120204

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.