Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37081459›Full record

ArticleBMC surgery2023

Revisional bariatric surgery after adjustable gastric band: a multicenter Polish Revision Obesity Surgery Study (PROSS).

Natalia Dowgiałło-Gornowicz, Michał Janik, Paweł Lech, Grzegorz Kowalski, Piotr Major, PROSS –Collaborative Study Group

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in BMC surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05108532 (Polish Revision Obesity Surgery Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05108532 unknown statusnot on this map

Polish Revision Obesity Surgery Study

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorMedical University of GdanskRan2021 to 2021Enrolled700ConditionsMetabolic Disease, Obesity, Morbid
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 11 institutions in 1 country.

Natalia Dowgiałło-GornowiczDepartment of General, Minimally Invasive and Elderly Surgery, Collegium Medicum, University of Warmia and Mazury, Olsztyn, Poland. natalia.dowgiallo@gmail.com.
Michał JanikDepartment of Surgery, Military Institute of Aviation Medicine, Warsaw, Poland.
Paweł LechDepartment of General, Minimally Invasive and Elderly Surgery, Collegium Medicum, University of Warmia and Mazury, Olsztyn, Poland.
Grzegorz KowalskiSurgery Clinic Mazan, Katowice, Poland.
Piotr Major2nd Department of General Surgery, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Cracow, Poland.
PROSS –Collaborative Study Group
Wojskowy Instytut Medycyny Lotniczej · PLJagiellonian University · PLUniversity of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn · PLNicolaus Copernicus University · PLMedical University of Białystok · PLEuromedic · PLGdańsk Medical University · PLMedical University of Lodz · PLMedical University of Warsaw · PLPostgraduate School of Molecular Medicine · PLWitelon State University of Applied Sciences in Legnica · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAdjustable gastric band (AGB) hadbeen the preferred treatment for morbid obesity because it is minimally invasive and reversible. But now it seems to be slowly becoming a historic procedure due to the disappointing effects. The aim of the study was to systematize and present the available data on revisional bariatric surgery (RBS) after AGB among Polish patients.

methodsIt is a multicenter, retrospective analysis of patients undergoing laparoscopic RBS after AGB in 12 Polish bariatric centers. The database included patient demographics, comorbidities and surgical outcomes.

resultsThe group consisted of 234 patients who underwent AGB, which accounted for 29% of revisional cases recorded in the Polish Revisional Obesity Surgery Study (PROSS). 195 were women (83%), and 39 were men (17%). One hundred seventy-five patients after AGB experienced a weight regain (74.5%), 36 patients a gastric band slippage (15.0%), 14 patients had gastric band intolerance (6.0%). Types of RBS included 116 sleeve gastrectomies (SG) (49.4%), 86 Roux-en Y gastric by-passes (RYGB) (36.6%), 20 one anastomosis gastric by-passes (OAGB) (8,5%). The highest weight loss expressed as %EBMIL was observed after OAGB (63.5 ± 32.4%).

conclusionsThe main indication for RBS after AGB was weight regain. SG was the most frequently chosen type of RBS after AGB. RBS after AGB leads to weight loss and improvement in type 2 diabetes and hypertension with an acceptable low risk of complications.

trial registrationNCT05108532.

Indexed as

Bariatric SurgeryDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Gastric BypassGastroplastyLaparoscopyObesity, MorbidFemaleHumansMalePolandReoperationRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeWeight GainWeight LossAdjustable gastric bandAGBBariatric surgeryRevisional bariatric surgeryRevision surgery

Identifiers

PMID37081459
PMCPMC10120208
OpenAlexW4366548892

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.