ArticleBMC women's health2023
Utility of vaginal vault cytology in the local recurrence of cervical cancer.
Article in BMC women's health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Trends in the burden of HPV-associated cancers in Mexico: An analysis from 2011 to 2019.PloS one · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn Japan, 8000 women were newly diagnosed with cervical cancer in 2018. The healthcare insurance policy in Japan allows physicians to utilize vaginal volt cytology tests and serum biomarker measurement at every visit and imaging analysis at an adequate interval with screening for recurrence after initial treatment. However, the major surveillance guidelines published in the United States and European countries recommend focusing on pelvic examinations and symptom reviews to avoid unnecessary tests. This study aimed to reassess the benefits of standard surveillance methods adopted in this study by retrospective analysis.
methodsFrom January 2009 to December 2015, the medical records of patients with recurrence who were initially diagnosed with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage I-III cervical cancer were collected for this study. Clinicopathological data were statistically analyzed to identify significant factors. In the first 2 years, the patients underwent regular surveillance, including pelvic examination, serum tumor marker tests, vaginal vault cytology every 1-3 months, and imaging analysis at 6- to 12-month intervals. In the following 2 years, the patients received a regular check with the same methods every 4 months and an annual imaging analysis. Afterward, the patients had regular screening every 6 to 12 months.
resultsIn the study period, 84 of the 981 patients experienced recurrence, and 88.1% had an asymptomatic recurrence. The disease-free interval was not related to the recurrence site. In univariate analysis, primary treatment, recurrence site, and diagnostic method were significant factors for survival outcomes. In contrast, multivariate analysis indicated that only primary treatment was a significant factor. In patients with local recurrence, multivariate analysis demonstrated that radiation as salvage therapy was an independent predictive factor for overall survival after recurrence.
conclusionsIn this retrospective study, routine imaging analysis and serum biomarker measurement did not contribute to patient prognosis after recurrence. In contrast, vaginal vault cytology can improve survival after recurrence in some patients. Tailored surveillance methods based on individual disease conditions and treatment modalities can improve post-recurrent survival outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.