ArticleBMC oral health2023
Quality of web-based Arabic health information on dental implants: an infodemiological study.
Article in BMC oral health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Assessment of the Arabic patient-centered online information about orthodontic pain: A quality and readability assessment.PloS one · 2024Pooled it
- Quality, understandability, and actionability of Arabic web-based content on periodontal and related oral surgical procedures: a cross-sectional infodemiological study.The Saudi dental journal · 2026Article
- Quality, readability, and transparency of Arabic online health information on temporomandibular disorders: An infodemiological analysis of 408 websites.Journal of Taibah University Medical Sciences · 2026Article
- Article
- Level of Awareness About Dental Veneers and Their Oral Hygiene Care Among the General Saudi Public: A Cross-Sectional Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Assessment of the Quality and Readability of Web-Based Arabic Health Information on Halitosis: Infodemiological Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2024Article
- Assessment of Arabic Web-Based Knowledge About Root Canal Treatment: An Infodemiologic Study.Cureus · 2024Article
- Arabic Web-Based Information on Oral Lichen Planus: Content Analysis.JMIR formative research · 2024Article
- Quality and readability of web-based information on dental caries in Arabic: an infodemiological study.BMC oral health · 2023Article
- Assessment of Arabic Web-Based Knowledge About Clear Aligners: An Infodemiologic Study.Cureus · 2023Article
- Article
- Quality and accuracy of clear aligner Arabic information on Instagram: A content-based analysis.Digital healthArticle
- Article
- Is Arabic online patient-centered information about dental extraction trustworthy? An infodemiological study.Digital healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn the era of the internet, patients seek health information ahead of getting the required treatment. Dental implant, which is among the most sought dental treatments, is not an exception. Incorrect health related information may lead to harmful deeds, so this study sought to assess the quality of web-based Arabic health information on dental implants.
methodsThe following engines were searched: Google ( http://www.google.com ), Yahoo! ( http://www.yahoo.com ), and Bing ( http://www.bing.com ) on 13 January 2022 for specific Arabic terms on "dental implants". The first 100 consecutive websites from each engine were analyzed for eligibility. The eligible websites were assessed using JAMA benchmarks tool, DISCERN tool, and HONcode. An online tool (including FKGL, SMOG and FRE) was used to assess readability of the websites.
resultsThere were 65 eligible websites, of which only one (1.5%) was HONcode certified. Only 3 (4.5%) websites attained a high score (> 65 out of 80) based on DISCERN tool: The mean DISCERN score was 41.14 ± 12.64. The mean JAMA score was 1.69 ± 1.13; however, only five (7.6%) met all JAMA criteria. The main shortcomings were attributed to not meeting the "Attribution" (54 [83.1%]) and "Authorship" (43 [66.2%]) criteria. The mean grade level of FKGL score was 7.0 ± 4.5. The majority of the websites (60%) scored less than 7, indicating easy content to understand. The mean grade level of SMOG score required to understand a website's text was 3.2 ± 0.6. Around 91% of the websites had reading ease scores ≥ 80, suggesting that the website's content was easy to read.
conclusionUnfortunately, although readable, most of the easily accessible web-based Arabic health information on dental implants does not meet the recognized quality standards.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.